Faux News Prime “Downward Spiral”

Is this this a trend?

April ’05 marks “the sixth consecutive month where FNC declined versus prior month in M-F, primetime P25-54 (every month since Nov ’04),” CNN’s press release says. The 25-54 demo is coveted by advertisers. One insider called it a “downward spiral.” FNC still has more demo viewers than CNN, though (443k vs. 304k in April). Here are FNC’s month-by-month weekday primetime averages in the 25-54 demographic:

Oct. 04: 1,074,000 / Nov. 04: 891,000 / Dec. 04: 568,000 / Jan. 05: 564,000 / Feb. 05: 520,000 / March 05: 498,000 / April 05: 445,000

> Also: In April 2005, FNC’s weekday primetime demo average decreased 25% compared to the year-ago, while CNN increased 27%.

Queen City Considers Offering Same Sex Benefits to Gov’t Employees

It’s good to see that the county government in Charlotte, my old hometown, is considering giving spousal benefits to same sex couples. Pam’s House Blend out of Durham has a great round up of the ins and outs.

Naturally, wingnuts are threatening recrimination at election time for Mecklenburg County Commissioners who support the move, but some of us remember that when GOP commissioners tried to de-fund an arts agency for putting up a few bucks for a professional theatre production of “Angels in America” they were the ones who were turned out by voters.

Charlotte, with a metro population of 2 million – and 4 million residents in a 100 mile radius – is the biggest city, by far, in the Carolinas. It is also the second largest repository of banking resources in the US. Both Bank of America and Wachovia Bank are headquartered there, among dozens of other banking, insurance and other financial institutions. As Pam points out, Charlotte-Mecklenburg was one of a handful (three?) NC’s 100 counties that voted for Kerry in the 2004 presidential elections.

The national Dems have long ignored North Carolina’s significance to the party, despite the fact that it is the 10th largest state in population – will likely move ahead of New Jersey in size in the next census (largely because millions of people from Jersey have moved there). NC has had Democratic governors for the past 24 out of 32 years and its legislature is controlled by the Dems. When we start to make inroads in the South, I predict NC will be the first GOP stronghold to fall.

(Btw, Charlotte is called the Queen City because it was named after Queen Charlotte, the wife of mad King George III.)

GOP House Leaders: Bread, Circuses & Steroids

My congressman, Rep. Henry Waxman, Ranking Minority Member of the Committee on Government Reform and a member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, sent a letter to his constituents yesterday that perfectly illustrates how the GOP is avoids dealing with issues that would redound poorly to their backers in the corporate plutocracy that is now running this country.

These are the issues that Waxman and the Democrats in the House are urgently working on:
DOD Audits: Halliburton Overcharges Top $212 Million
Withheld Data Shows ‘Dramatic Up-tick’ in Terrorist Attacks
Waxman Amendment Would Reduce Dependence on Foreign Oil
Rep. Waxman Requests Hearing on Pediatric Vaccine Stockpile
President Urged to Reject Pledge Requirements in HIV/AIDS Funding

Instead of dealing with these issues, here’s what the GOP leadership is holding hearings on:

COMMITTEE HEARING
Wednesday, April 27 — The Government Reform Committee will hold a hearing on the National Football League’s steroids policy as part of the Committee’s ongoing examination of steroids use in sports.

LAT Business Columnist: Schwarzenegger Bored by Government, Only Interested in the Trappings of Power

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has been getting nothing but bad press here in California for the past few weeks – all of it is richly deserved, of course. Seems a lot of people are fed up with his bad acting when applied to governance – “I’m not the governor. I just play him on TV.”

Now comes a new fusilade of criticism from Los Angeles Times business page columnist Michael Hiltzik that really nails Schwarzenegger for his antics and poor performance. If you’re still a fan of the Gubernator, read this and weep:

One by one, the governor’s grand initiatives have come apart. The box-exploding state reorganization? Abandoned. The balanced state budget? A non-starter. Government without special interests? A joke. Bipartisanship in Sacramento? Never happened… This [poor performance] is probably not a bad thing, because like virtually every other policy initiative Schwarzenegger has proposed since his election, these reforms generally have been carelessly conceived and half-baked in execution.

As governor, Schwarzenegger has played his hand recklessly because he believes he has a deep reservoir of support from the voters, whom he confuses with his fans of his movies. It was his fans who got him elected, but most of those guys (and they were mostly young males) don’t usually show up at the polls. He’s coasted through his first term, always assuming he could go over the heads of the pols and pundits by taking his issues to “da peepul” via ballot measures.

This is Schwarzenegger’s preferred method of governance, because it doesn’t require subjecting a proposal to the battle-testing of the legislative process or to public debate. It only requires the spending of money — which [business groups that support the Governor] can provide in abundance — and the presentation on television of Schwarzenegger’s electric grin.

But here’s what many of us have been saying about Schwarzenegger from the time he entered the race to become governor:

All that Schwarzenegger seems to enjoy is the opportunity to surround himself with attention and pomp — the trappings of political power, the appearances before huge crowds, the slavish interviews by Oprah and Katie. He’s like one of those admirals in Gilbert and Sullivan, who adorn themselves in elaborate uniforms dripping with medals but don’t know the first thing about going to sea. (And don’t want to know.)…

His lack of understanding that politics is the art of building consensus and reaching compromise over the long term explains why he retreats into name-calling and petulant sulking when he doesn’t get his way, a personality trait that never has been even remotely charming and has now become tiresome and self-destructive.

It’s also becoming clear why he has never articulated a coherent philosophy of government — he doesn’t have one.

I’ve always thought that when the going got messy in Sacramento, Schwarzenegger would get bored – and get going. It seems increasingly likely that before his term was up, he will be back here in LA cutting a deal to return to moviemaking (even though he pledged he wouldn’t). First, however, we’ll see a new team of GOP image-makers brought in from DC. They’ll come up with a poll-tested new persona for Schwarzenegger to play – more Reagan and less Bush, I suspect. He’ll trot out his new governor-character via an interveiw with Barbara Walters or his pal Oprah.

But the thing about politics is, politicians develop a record, and his record as governor is as lousy as they come. He has managed to make Gray Davis look like, well, Ronald Reagan. Maybe if Arnold would spend less time acting like a governor and more time actually trying to solve any number of the crises we face, he might overcome his sophomore year slump. But if past record is the best indicator of future performance, I suspect we’re in for a whole lot more of the same old same old.

Schwarzenegger’s program is a shambles, his popularity is deteriorating, and he seems to be spending less time in the public eye. The state is deeper in debt than ever. The schools and the roads are crumbling at a faster pace. Far from being one of California’s “most transformative governors,” [as he was described by conservative columnist George Will], he’s well on his way to ending the term with scarcely any accomplishments at all.

No wonder that his wife recently appeared on “Oprah” to telegraph his reluctance to run for a second term. In the next gubernatorial term, all the problems that Schwarzenegger has failed to address in this one will come home to roost. He’d be insane to run again, and we’d be insane to reelect him: A Gov. Schwarzenegger even more bored and nettled by the mundane tasks of governing California than the one we currently have in office is a truly scary prospect.

Message Point: Jesus Was a Liberal

So “Justice Sunday” has come and gone. The Senate Majority Leader, Sen. Bill Frist, right, played his part in the evangelical video conclave to help turn the Christian Right’s court-packing into a religious crusade. It just slays me how far these folks have strayed from the teachings of the leader they claim to follow.

For one thing, today’s religious Right would never have approved of the man Jesus. He was, in today’s political speak, a leftwing radical. If you believe the New Testament – or Mel Gibson – Jesus’ poltical actions, particularly clearing the moneychangers from the temple, were deliberately intended to outrage the corrupt conservatives who ran the temple and their allies, the Romans, who ran the government. Jesus knew that the punishment for political agitation was death. The cruxification of Jesus was the benchmark of political martyrdom in Western history.

If the man called Jesus were alive today, would he be a TV evangelist like Jerry Falwell who spreads hatred and fear to the ignorant masses? Would he ride in limos, fly in private jets and own diamond mines in South Africa like Pat Robertson? Would he bethrone himself at the Vatican, reigning over a religious empire that is mired in the past, subjugates women and incites the global population crisis?

Not bloody likely. Jesus would seek out the poor and downtrodden – not to fleece them but to offer them hope. He would see very little difference between the moneychangers in the temple 2000 years ago and religious leaders today who accumulate the trappings of wealth – whether they are TV evangelists or bishops of Rome.

Jesus had a message of love, but he also had moments when he was scornful and impatient (after all, he was only human!) especially toward the powerful few who used their position to oppress the powerless. Why would a current-day Jesus be any different?

Fortunately for those in the Christian Right who are hellbent on turning this country into a theocratic state and/or bringing about the Second Coming, there is no such thing as Judgment Day because if Jesus did come back, he’d be mighty pissed at folks who are engaging in McCarthyite politics in his name.

Are ‘Real’ Republicans Finally Waking Up to the Theocracy in the Big Tent?

When Reagan invited Jerry Falwell and his Moral Majority into the GOP tent in the 1980 campaign, I remember thinking that the “real” Republicans – the folks who resent every penny the government takes out of their pay but who gladly spend the equivalent of tuition to Harvard on country club dues – weren’t going to be happy sharing the tent with the Bible Thumpers for very long.

The Republicans were outnumbered in those days, and they needed this new blood to fill out their ranks. Although the relationship has been rocky over the years – the Country Clubbers weren’t happy with Pat Buchanan’s call for jihad in ’92, in particular; and many of them, especially the men, were put off by know-it-all Newt and the Clinton impeachment shenanigans – the two groups have managed to get along fairly well, especially under Bush.

The Country Clubbers like Bush because he was a businessman – never mind that all his business endeavors were abject failures. The Bible Thumbers like Bush’s story that he is a born-again Christian despite the fact that nothing in his behavior, not to mention his Adminstration’s Robin-Hood-in-reverse policies, aligns with the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Now, however it seems a rift may be developing between the Republican Party’s two wings:

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist will draw a chorus of amens today when thousands of evangelicals across the United States hear his call to put more conservative judges on the federal bench.

But even as the Tennessee Republican addresses “Justice Sunday” — a 90-minute simulcast to conservative churches that backs a Senate rule change to speed nominations — the leader faces apprehension from another key GOP constituency.

The country’s leading business lobbying associations, close GOP allies in recent legislative efforts and political campaigns, have told senior Republicans that they will not back the Frist initiative to force votes on judicial candidates.

Business leaders say they fear the move would halt Senate action on their long-awaited priorities — as Democrats have vowed to do if Frist moves ahead with a rule change they say would drastically alter the traditions of a body designed to respect the rights of the minority party.

“If we do that, then all else is going to stop,” said Thomas J. Donohue, head of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, during a meeting with reporters Friday.

He then reeled off a list of business priorities that could be delayed for months in the resulting partisan uproar. He expressed the same concerns directly to Frist’s office in recent days.

The dynamic here is very interesting. Each wing of the GOP has something the party needs. The Clubbers have the money; and the Thumpers have the votes. If something – or some outside group such as, let’s say, the Democrats – were to drive a wedge between these two wings, it would cripple the conservative movement.

The Republicans have used wedge issues such as gay marriage to cull so-called “Independents” from the Democrats. If dissension in the ranks of the GOP escalates, the Democrats may have an opportunity to use wedge issues – stem cell research and the government intervention into the Schiavo matter, come to mind – to separate the Republicans from themselves.

What the Poodle Knew

As one who never bought the Bushies’ hogwash in the run-up to the war in Iraq, the only piece of the puzzle that made me doubt my instincts that the Bush team – Bush, Cheney, Powell and Rice – were simply lying about the reasons the reasons for going to war was the strange case of the whole-hearted support they received from British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

He’d seemed a like sensible guy during the Clinton years – almost a Britsh version of President Clinton, sharing the same ability to state his case convincingly and to connect with his audience. How could this apparently otherwise savvy politician buy into the lies, so much so that he was dubbed “Bush’s Poodle” in the British press?

I still can’t answer that one. But now it is clear he went farther than simply buying into the lies:

The Prime Minister was warned it could be illegal for Britain to attack Iraq. Not liking the advice from his lawyers, he pretended that advice was different in public, and persuaded them to change it in private.

We can add this noxious fact to the others we already knew. He lied about a non-existent threat to this country from Saddam Hussein. He lied about weapons of mass destruction which were not there.

And it is clear from all that has happened since this unwise adventure that life for most Iraqis is actually worse as a result, not better as he claimed it would be and still pretends that it is.

It is difficult to imagine a more wretched catalogue of falsehood and incompetence – exposing our soldiers to possible prosecution, debasing the parliamentary process, suborning the intelligence services so that they became propaganda agencies, bullying civil servants into bending the truth, then spending billions on false pretences and, above all, bringing about the deaths of innocent civilians and of British servicemen.

Yet here we are in the midst of an Election, and the man responsible, incredibly, is ahead in the polls and likely to cruise to a third successive victory.

Welcome to our world, mate!

Caught on Tape: Evangelical Leaders Plot Subversion of US Judiciary

An audio recording obtained by the Los Angeles Times: has nabbed two leading wingnuts plotting to subvert the federal judiciary via Congressional fiat, chiefly by zeroing out funding for courts whose decisions they and their Constitution-hating supporters don’t like.

The two plotters are Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council, and James C. Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family. They were caught on tape by a representative of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

“There’s more than one way to skin a cat, and there’s more than one way to take a black robe off the bench,” said Perkins, according to the Times. He also said that he had huddled with Republican congressional leaders recently to plot the the stripping funding from certain courts. “What they’re thinking of is not only the fact of just making these courts go away and re-creating them the next day but also defunding them,” Perkins said.

He said that instead of undertaking the long process of trying to impeach judges, Congress could use its appropriations authority to “just take away the bench, all of his staff, and he’s just sitting out there with nothing to do.”…

Dobson, who emerged last year as one of the evangelical movement’s most important political leaders, named one potential target: the California-based U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

“Very few people know this, that the Congress can simply disenfranchise a court,” Dobson said. “They don’t have to fire anybody or impeach them or go through that battle. All they have to do is say the 9th Circuit doesn’t exist anymore, and it’s gone.”

Even poor SpongeBob Squarepants was dragged into the coup plotting:

As part of the discussion, Perkins and Dobson referred to remarks by Dobson earlier this year at a congressional dinner in which he singled out the use by one group of the cartoon character SpongeBob SquarePants in a video that Dobson said promoted a homosexual agenda.

Dobson was ridiculed for his comments, which some critics interpreted to mean the evangelist had determined that the cartoon character was gay.

Dobson said the beating he took in the media, coming after his appearance on the cover of newsmagazines hailing his prominence in Bush’s reelection, proved that the press will only seek to tear him down.

This will not be the last thing that you read about that makes me look ridiculous,” he said.

From his lips to God’s ears.

Message Point: If Being Gay Is a ‘Choice,’ Ergo Heterosexuality Is a Choice Too

Wingnuts like Lou Sheldon (right), chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition, and the reverends Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson and their ilk must cast gayness as a “choice” in order to prevent same-sex orientation from being considered “natural,” which would make gay people worthy of protection under civil rights laws. (Thus ending one of their most lucrative fundraising hot buttons.)

Many years ago, the best response our side could come up with to charges that we “chose” to be gay was – Who would choose to be part of a hated underclass – a societal pariah?Although there is truth to this, it conjures up the very sociological paradigm we’re trying to move past.

The fact is, nobody chooses their sexuality. Some people are born with a predeliction to be 100% straight; others are born definitely gay. What muddies the water – especially for rigid-minded, unworldly folks like Evangelicals who can only see the world in black or white – is that there’s a third group of people whose sexuality is more fluid. These people experiment in college but usually settle down, one way or the other. In this sense, bisexuals can, and do, “choose” their sexual preference.

But here’s the point: If gay people “choose” their sexuality – and presumably this happens at some point during adolesence – then it stands to reason that straight people must make a choice during their teen years too.

So here are some open question to Lou Sheldon: Sir, would you please tell us about the moment in your life when you chose to be heterosexual? What sort of introspection led up to this decision? Was it a difficult choice? And how many sexual encounters with other males did you have before you decided to be straight?

(Of course, this assumes that Sheldon is, in fact, straight. His effeminate, even mincing behavior has set off more than a few gaydar detectors over the years. And the record is now replete with self-loathing gays in the Republican ranks – Jeff Gannon/James Guckert, Rep. Mark Foley, Rep. David Dreier, and Gop operative Arthur Finklestein, just to name a few.)