The Convention Indentation
Mitt Romney must be down in the dumps.
Even with Paul Ryan, his numbers slumped.
“It just wasn’t fair,”
He told Clint Eastwood’s chair —
“I didn’t get even a baby convention bump!”
Mitt Romney must be down in the dumps.
Even with Paul Ryan, his numbers slumped.
“It just wasn’t fair,”
He told Clint Eastwood’s chair —
“I didn’t get even a baby convention bump!”
It’s inevitable, we know that he’ll bore us.
And we’d rather have him against us than for us.
He says if Obama wins the fight
Prepare for a millennium without light!
Is there no one who can save us from Chuck Norris?

“It would be more appropriate to make its complaint against CBO than against President Obama’s speech.”
— Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in a post titled, “AP Factcheck Should be Billed to Romney Campaign.” Baker takes issue with Associated Press “fact checkers” who claim there would be no peace dividend from winding down the war in Afghanistan.
President Obama is working off a baseline set by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) that assumes war spending continues over the next decade. If he doesn’t intend to continue this spending then he is freeing up money relative to this baseline. AP may not like this method of scoring, but it is absolutely standard in Washington policy debates. Changes are measured against a baseline.
Baker joins others who suggest that the AP’s analysis might have been more correctly classified as an editorial than as fact checking.
H/T to The Nation