Theory: GOP Lost Due to Voter Supression

May I suggest instead a simple, elegant overriding theory on why we won’t have a Romney Administration in 2013? No serious political party in America — no legitimate party in any viable democracy — can win an election by suppressing votes. So long as the Republican Party endorses (and enacts) voting laws designed to make it harder for registered voters to vote, so long as Republican officials like Ohio’s Jon Husted contort themselves to interpret those laws in a restrictive fashion, the Republicans will continue to play a loser’s game. … That’s my theory, anyway, and I’m sticking to it. Having covered for the past two years the voting rights front in this epic election cycle, I have come to believe that the Republicans will begin to win presidential elections again only when they start competing for votes with the substance of their ideas.

— Andrew Cohen, writing in the Atlantic.

Democratic Votes for House Candidates Actually Exceeded Republican Votes in Election

53,952,240

Votes were cast for a Democratic candidate for the House and only 53,402,643 were cast for a Republican — meaning that Democratic votes exceed Republican votes by more than half a million, according to Think Progress: “Although a small number of ballots remain to be counted, as of this writing, votes for a Democratic candidate for the House of Representatives outweigh votes for Republican candidates…”

Obama Re-Election Boosts U.S. Flag Sales in Pakistan

Of course Obama has become stronger now and he will push his policies harder and there will be more drone strikes because he himself is stronger now. When the drone strikes increase the protests against these strikes will also increase in Pakistan and it can have an impact on the flags and poster business.

— Nadeem Shah, owner of a flag business in Rawalpindi, explaining the uptick in sales of U.S. flags in Pakistan is due to an increase in flag burnings at anti-American protests.

Karl Rove Was a Bigger Loser Than Mitt Romney on Election Day

1%

The return on investment (ROI) from Karl Rove’s American Crossroads super PAC in the 2012 elections, since almost every candidate for which the group ran ads lost. Rove’s Crossroads GPS, which is not required to disclose its donors, had a 13% ROI. Together, the two groups spent about $176 million, mostly on TV ads. By contrast, Priorities USA Action, a Democratic super PAC, had a 100% ROI, since it put its $67 million behind Pres. Obama. Majority PAC, which supported Democratic Senate candidates, produced a 70% ROI, and House Majority PAC, a 44% ROI.

Obama Victory Shows Cuban-Americans are Transcending One-Issue Status

Obama was the first Democrat to win the Cuban-American vote in Florida since the Cuban Revolution. This changes FL & national politics.

— @d_simas, a staff member of Obama for America, on Twitter. Simas is right that Cuban-Americans supporting a Democrat is huge, and probably a result of the gradual devolution of anti-Castro sentiment, especially among younger Cuban-Americans who have no memory of life before the 1959 revolution.