Study: Just 13% of Voters Are Tea Baggers – And Their Anti- Establishment Rage Fails to Connect with 72% of Americans

art-obamcare-posterNews coverage of tea baggers’ protest rallies has given them the appearance of a groundswell movement sweeping the nation. Pundits regularly cite them as dominant players in the coming elections. Recently, the Republican establishment has started courting them. Last week, addressing a crowd of John McCain supporters in Arizona, Sarah Palin said, “Everyone here today supporting John McCain, we are all part of that Tea Party movement.” Former Vice Pres. Dan Quayle recently described them as Pres. Richard Nixon’s “Silent Majority” who were “silent no more.” Not surprisingly, all the attention has given tea baggers an inflated sense of their importance which they project by routinely exaggerating the crowd sizes at their rallies.

And yet, despite all Sturm und Drang, a new Quinnipiac poll finds that just 13 percent of the electorate claims to be affiliated with tea party groups. Paradoxically, given the tea baggers’ propensity for racism, 13 percent is roughly same size as the African-American electorate.

Some statistics from the survey are unsurprising:

  • 74 percent are Republicans or independent voters leaning Republican
  • 5 percent are solidly independent
  • 88 percent are white (but no details are provided on the ethnic break-out of the non-white members)
  • While only 33 percent of all voters have a favorable opinion of Sarah Palin, among tea baggers 72 percent have a favorable opinion of her
  • 77 percent voted for Sen. John McCain in 2008

(We’d like to see the percentage of tea baggers who voted for George Bush — the man most responsible for the American economic collapse and waste of blood and treasure they are so upset about — and would bet it’s the same or higher than the 77 percent who voted for McCain.)

But a few factoids from the survey go against the media narrative about members of the group:

  • 16 percent are Democrats or independent voters leaning Democratic
  • 15 percent voted for President Barack Obama
  • 45 percent are men/55 percent are women

The poll also found that while 28 of voters have a favorable view of tea baggers (but note that this number must include the tea baggers themselves), and 23 percent view them unfavorably, the vast majority of Americans — 49 percent — say they don’t know enough about the group to form an opinion. The takeaway here is that 72 percent of the country either rejects or has failed to connect with the tea baggers’ anti-establishment rage.

The remaining 28 percent is an interesting and familiar number in American politics. It is a bit larger than the 23 percent of Americans who identify themselves as Republicans. In 1974, it was roughly the same percentage of Americans who said they still supported Pres. Richard Nixon when he resigned the presidency in disgrace. It is also close to the number who still supported George W. Bush when he left office in 2009.

Still, it’s hard to imagine that normal Americans don’t “know enough about the group,” per se, since stories about tea baggers and their antics have dominated the news — across the full spectrum, from corporate outlets like the Los Angeles Times, New York Times, CNN and broadcast news to right-wing propaganda sources like Fox News and hate radio and even liberal news and opinion sites like Pensito Review — for over a year now. It’s more likely that the confusion arises from the incoherence of the tea baggers’ messaging.

Unlike real protest groups — the ones that are antiwar, anti-abortion or pro-civil rights, etc. — tea baggers do not have a central unifying objective (or one they’ll admit too, at least). Reinforcing this, a Bloomberg poll released late last week found that tea baggers fervently hold beliefs that are diametrically contradictory:

…More than 90 percent of Tea Party backers say the U.S. is verging toward socialism, but 70 percent want a federal government that fosters job creation, but 90 percent say the country is on the wrong track and Washington can’t find solutions, but more than 80 percent say expansion of the government’s role in the economy is a high threat, but almost half say the government should do something about executive bonuses on Wall Street.

Quinnipiac found similar confusion within tea bagger ranks:

Government does too many things better left to businesses and individuals, 54 percent of all voters say, while 42 percent say government is not doing enough. Tea Party members say 83 – 15 percent that government is doing too much.

Tea baggers put their internal confusion — or obfuscation — about their objectives on display every time they hold a rally. At real protest rallies, you’d expect to see participants carrying signs bearing messages related to their central cause — opposition to war or abortion or support of the environment or gay rights, for example.

At tea bagger rallies, what you see is a cacophony of messages on signs opposing all sorts of things, leaving the impression, at best, that tea baggers are anti-establishment. At worst, what you see in the signs is that what unifies them is not opposition to a policy or ideology but rather against one man: Pres. Obama.

And this prompts the question: None of the crises the United States is facing started on the president’s watch, so where were these protesters — and where was their rage — when George Bush was president?

Verbatim

My theory of why no one in politics likes to think about political science: because it renders them powerless. How do you do your job as a political consultant when the truth is that 90 percent of the success or failure of what you do will be determined by the unemployment rate? … The point is, we need to believe we’re in control. Political science tells everyone in politics the opposite: You’re not in control. The economy rules your fate — the rest is just pissing in the wind.

— Ryan Sager, author of “The Elephant in the Room: Evangelicals, Libertarians, and the Battle to Control the Republican Party.”

Palin: When I Urged Tea Baggers ‘Don’t Retreat, Instead — RELOAD!’ What I Meant Was ‘Vote’

map-palins-hit-list-fullSarah Palin’s latest gaffe started last Tuesday when she tried to rally her troops in the face of her party’s crushing defeat on health-care reform by posting a United States map with gunsight icons marking districts of Democratic congressmen she has targeted for defeat in the fall.

Along with the map of gun targets, Palin added, “Don’t Retreat, Instead — RELOAD!”

Now, in one of the most transparently false attempts at spin we’ve seen since the Bush administration left town, Palin is trying walk back what she intended to convey by releasing a map that certainly appears to be a hit list.

She rolled out the walk-back in Bush country — at a rally in Midland, Texas. “‘Take up your arms’ means voting,” Palin told the adoring crowd.

Of course, she didn’t say “Take up arms.” She said, “RELOAD!”

At a campaign rally in Arizona for her running mate in 2008, Sen. John “Grampy” McCain, she read the line again:

“We know violence isn’t the answer. When we take up our arms, we’re talking about our vote.”

What we learned during the Bush administration is that normal Americans have limited patience with this sort of horse hockey — especially instances like this when it’s obvious the spinner is working on the assumption that everyone listening to her is stupid.

Of course, Palin’s spin is not, sorry, targeted at regular Americans. She thinks she’s speaking just to the half-wits who worship her. It doesn’t matter to her now that the rest of us are listening — but we are.

Tea-Baggers are Fervently Vague In Their Beliefs

tea-party1

A new Bloomberg survey finds that more than 90 percent of Tea Party backers say the U.S. is verging toward socialism, but 70 percent want a federal government that fosters job creation, but 90 percent say the country is on the wrong track and Washington can’t find solutions, but more than 80 percent say expansion of the government’s role in the economy is a high threat, but almost half say the government should do something about executive bonuses on Wall Street.

Further, tea-baggers are conflicted over whether private-enterprise elements should be introduced into government programs like Social Security and Medicare.

I’m not sensing anything like a platform or even coherence here …

“The ideas that find nearly universal agreement among Tea Party supporters are rather vague,” says J. Ann Selzer, the pollster who created the survey. “You would think any idea that involves more government action would be anathema, and that is just not the case.”

Overall, 26 percent of respondents in the poll identified themselves as Tea Party backers, while 53 percent said they weren’t and 21 percent said they weren’t sure. I can grok that — how do you know whether you support the Tea Party when you don’t know what it stands for, besides the right to protest — anything.

According to the survey, Tea Party supporters are likely to be older, white and male. Forty percent are age 55 and over, compared with 32 percent of all poll respondents; just 22 percent are under 35, 79 percent are white and 61 percent are men. Many are Christian fundamentalists, with 44 percent identifying themselves as “born-again,” compared with 33 percent of all respondents.

Here’s a closing quote from a guy who could be the Tea Party’s poster child:

“It’s just the fundamental right of people to protest,” says Victor Mondello, a 79-year-old retiree from Andover, Massachusetts.

‘Nuff said.

To Repeal Health Care Law, GOP Must Elect 26 New Senators, 112 House Members

Health-care reform is now law. The Republicans’ strategy of mortally wounding the Obama presidency by killing the bill — making defeat of the legislation the president’s Waterloo — has failed, and yet they just can’t stop lying.

Republicans’ claim now that they’ll “repeal and replace” the reforms if they win control of Congress may be their most ridiculous lie yet.

In the long list of agitprop prevarications — that reforms would create death panels, lead to rationing, constitute a government takeover, put government bureaucrats between patients and doctors, cover illegal aliens, use taxpayer funds to pay for abortions and the rest — their claim now that they’ll “repeal and replace” the reforms if they win control of Congress may be the most ridiculous yet.

A more likely scenario is that independent voters will realize that the Armageddon Republicans promised is not coming, and never was. Worse, these voters may even find there’s much to like about the tax breaks, regulations on insurance companies and other goodies coming online and so be more likely to vote for Democrats in November than they say they are now, eight months out.

If public opinion turns around, Republicans will have an even harder time getting the two-thirds majorities in the House and Senate required to override the president’s veto of their repeal legislation. But even if it doesn’t, the odds that Republicans can get to two-thirds majorities, especially in the House, lie somewhere between slim and none — and they know it.

Kevin Osborne at Citybeat Cincinnati runs the numbers:

In the House of Representatives, there currently are 253 Democrats and 178 Republicans, with four vacant seats.

In the Senate, there currently are 57 Democrats, 41 Republicans and two independents.

Because it’s highly doubtful that the GOP will convince any Democrats who supported the bill to change their votes, that means Republicans would need to win 40 House seats and 10 Senate seats in this fall’s election to gain simple majorities to pass the bill. But to repeal some of the reforms — like the individual insurance mandate — they would need 60 votes in the Senate, meaning the GOP would have to gain 19 seats.

Even then, it wouldn’t be signed into law because there’s no doubt President Obama would veto it. To override a veto, Republicans would need two-thirds of each house.

That means 67 senators and 290 House members. To achieve that goal, Republicans would need to gain 26 seats in the Senate and 112 in the House.

Pres. Obama is says he hopes Republicans pursue repeal:

“This is the reform that some folks in Washington are still hollering about, still shouting about. Now that we passed it, they’re already promising to repeal it. They’re actually going to run on a platform of repeal in November,” Obama told a loud and friendly crowd of 3,000 in the University of Iowa Field House.

“And my attitude is: Go for it.”

Current projections by Nate Silver at FiveThirtyEight.com show Democrats holding a 54 to 46 seat margin after the elections in November. Silver gives the Republicans a 10 percent chance of taking a majority in the Senate.

However, in February, Silver said the “general consensus” is that Dems will lose as many as 40 seats, which would put them in range of a slim — but nowhere near veto-proof — majority.

Gibbs: McCain Acting Like a 6-Year-Old

john-mccain2

The Hill has reported that White House spokesman Robert Gibbs (once again proving he deserves Trish’s undying adoration) has compared Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) to a petulant child.

The sharp-tongued spokesman compared the cranky Sarah Palin co-conspirator to a child who wanted to “take his toys and go home.”

The dust up started Monday when McCain said the healthcare reform had so angered Republicans that they would not cooperate with Democrats anymore.

“There will be no cooperation for the rest of the year,” McCain said. “They have poisoned the well in what they’ve done and how they’ve done it.”

Gibbs responded today, comparing McCain to a 6-year-old.

“I find it curious that not getting your way on one thing means you’ve decided to take your toys and go home,” Gibbs said. “It doesn’t work well for my 6-year-old. I doubt it works well in the United States Senate, because we have issues that are important for his constituents and for all of America.”

Asked whether he was comparing McCain to a child, Gibbs replied: “I’m saying that I think the notion that if you don’t get what you want you’re not going to cooperate on anything else is not a whole lot different than I might hear from a 6-year-old.”

Verbatim

The ace we have in our pocket is the Republican party. The Republicans have concluded that their success lies in our failure. The American people are smart. They smell a rat. They know there was nothing about trying to get a better bill.

— Vice President Joe Biden, quoted by Fox News, on the administration’s health care victory.