Last Chance for Democrats — and Democracy

I’m going to say something that will have my ancestors whirling in their graves, something I never thought I would say, something that even to me seems incomprehensible.

I’m willing to abandon the Democrats. There it is.

I’m tired of wondering if George Bush will have to roast babies in the Rose Garden before anyone who represents me will stand up.

Understand, I come from a line of Democrats so long it has no known end. My peeps have forever been Dems, in registration if not always in action. My Uncle Bill, who like me was Democrat at birth, once told a former Republican friend who changed to our side, “It’s O.K. buddy. Before I was a Democrat I wasn’t nothing either.”

But times change. And I’m tired of our team losing, mostly at its own hands. I’m not for one minute suggesting that I would go over to the Dark Side. I’m saying I’m willing to entertain the idea of a third party if it will do what mine isn’t — saying what needs to be said and doing what needs to be done.

If Samuel Alito gets on the Supreme Court, it won’t be entirely the fault of the conservative whack jobs of which he is one. It will because good Democrats were too busy listening to themselves talk, since talk is all we can do. Others are trying so hard to please everyone that they end up pleasing no one, least of all “the base.”

The problem is that this matters so much. George Bush wants to stand democracy on its head, to abandon the constitution, to literally do what terrorists can’t — kill America and replace it with a fundamentalist totalitarian regime. All he needs is a compliant Supreme Court to go along with his compliant Congress.

I’m tired of being in the sheep party. I’m tired of hoping the next election will be the one that turns it all around. I’m tired of wondering if George Bush will have to roast babies in the Rose Garden before anyone who represents me will stand up.

I have emailed Sen. Bill Nelson, who has always done the right thing before, and asked him to vote no on Alito. Wherever you are, please let your own Democratic elected officials hear from you on this. They need to know we will back them up if they will just make this one brave move. They also need to know we aren’t kidding anymore. We are looking for a better party, either our own or a new one.

Playing Bush’s Get Out of Jail Free Card

Leonard Pitts can just quit writing now because I don’t think he will surpass this essay.

Remain true to the ideals that have guided us for 230 years or surrender them on the altar of expedience because we were too scared to live up to them

Karl Rove said in a speech last week that this year’s midterm election will be about security. So you know it will be about fear…

Hurricane Katrina has shown that the government could not effectively manage a catastrophe whose place and time it knew in advance…So yes, a national conversation about security could hardly be more timely. But it would be naive to think that’s what Rove meant.

…Experience tells us that with this crew, ”security” is just a code word for fear. So this election will hinge on making people think terrorists are going to get ’em if they don’t vote Republican.

A ruinous war fought under false pretenses? Sept. 11.

Indefinite detention of alleged terrorists? Sept. 11.

Torture? Sept. 11.

The right of the people to dissent? Sept. 11.

Spying on Americans in violation of federal law? Sept. 11.

A growing record of incompetence and lies? Sept. 11.

Fear is the president’s Get Out Of Jail Free card.

…what is at stake this year is not the fortunes of a party but the character of a nation. The choice is simple: remain true to the ideals that have guided us for 230 years or surrender them on the altar of expedience because we were too scared to live up to them.

Make no mistake: America is not for wimps. It takes guts to be an American, to believe in the rule of law, the freedom of dissent, the dignity of woman and man even when — especially when — it is more expedient not to. To be an American is to commit a daily act of faith.

Bush’s War On Terror Needs to End

Unjust justifications: As George Bush ramps up his campaign to justify the National Security Agency’s illegal spying on Americans, the language he uses emphasizes terrorism and war. He says (repeatedly) that the United States is engaged in a “war on terror,” and that justifies any illegal activities the government wants to commit, and damn the Consititution and the Congress.

In Europe they also have terrorism, but they approach it not in the language of war, but as a crime, the purview of the police. We don’t hear the inflamed rhetoric of war from the British government, we just hear in the news that they have rounded up almost 50 people associated with the London tube bombings. The police investigate and arrest the criminals. They don’t trod on the civil rights of innocent citizens or send suspected terrorists to so-called dark sites in Romania. They lock them up in the Hammersmith Palais and let the British justice system take its course.

When Timothy McVeigh blew up the Alfred E. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, then-President Bill Clinton did not declare war on terror. The FBI hunted down McVeigh and arrested him. He was tried, convicted and, in 2001, executed for killing 167 people and wounding hundreds more. No “rendition” was carried out. No illegal detention was employed. No fake charges were filed before a secret tribunal.

But come September 11, 2001, and George Bush declares war on terrorism and gets his carta blanca to do as he pleases and damn the Consititution and Congress. That ushers in the era of Gitmo, Korans down the toilet, water-boarding, renditions, secret torture chambers and Lyndie English’s special brand of sadism. It’s Bush’s Inquisition, complete with secret trials and confessions extracted through torture and intimidation. With Dick Cheney as his Torquemada, Bush has pursued his War of Terror with a vigor matched only by his zeal in giving tax breaks to the rich.

The War on Terror is about as effective as our vaunted War on Drugs. Employing the language of war on both of these imaginary fronts enables the government to ignore any civil rights or inconvenient laws that impede the search for terrorists or drug users/sellers. It enables the Defense Department to get involved in domestic police actions that violate the posse comitatus injunction against using the military to fight domestic crime.

George Bush is a criminal. He has broken the law — needlessly, it would appear. His hubris enables him to break the law and justify the act by invoking some nonexistent presidential powers. Bush is a criminal and should be impeached, and the War on Terror ended.

Dems Ask Bush to Explain Abramoff Ties, Influence

Feet to the fire: Top Dems, including Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, Assistant Senate Democratic Leader Richard Durbin, Senate Democratic Campaign Committee Chairman Charles Schumer and Senate Democratic Conference Secretary Debbie Stabenow sent George Bush a letter yesterday, and it was not an early Valentine.

The letter asks the prez to explain the nature of the quid pro quo between his administration and super-crook Jack Abramoff. It questions not only the influence deals covered already in the press, but asks bluntly how deep Bush’s hand went into Abramoff’s pocket and how many strings were attached.

It’s good to see the Democratic Party jumping on this scandal and making political hay with it. Read the whole letter here.

Thanks to Susan S. for the tip

Bush to Blame for Miners’ Deaths

Molly Ivins is asking some important questions about the recent fatal mining disaster.

“I had never seen something so corrupt and lawless in my entire career.”

Some of the press is starting to get the drill. Give us something like the West Virginia coal mine disaster, and instead of standing around emoting like Geraldo Rivera, a few reporters have enough sense to ask the obvious question: What is this mine’s safety record? And when it turns out to be abysmal, a few more reporters have enough sense to ask: Who’s in charge of doing something after a mine gets 205 safety violations in one year? Where’s the Mine Safety and Health Administration? Who runs it? What’s their background — are they professionals or mining industry stooges? Who’s the Michael “Heckuvajob” Brown in this outfit? Why are so many jobs at MSHA just left completely unfilled? How much has MSHA’s budget been cut since 2001 to pay for tax cuts for the rich?

The Sierra Club has the answers to some of those questions.

Among the earliest signs of danger, however, was when the Bush administration’s first head of MSHA, Jack Spadaro, was forced out of his job when he tried to investigate another mining disaster, this one a 300-million gallon coal slurry spill in Eastern Kentucky and West Virginia. “The Bush administration came in and the scope of our investigation was considerably shortened,” Spadaro told 60 Minutes in April 2004. “I had never seen something so corrupt and lawless in my entire career.” He was replaced by Dave Lauriski, a former mining executive. It is also worth noting here that President George W. Bush raised $376,000 in campaign contributions from coal mining interests in 2000 and 2004…

Thomas Frank at USA Today also reports that MSHA has issued $9.1 million in fines since 1999 to companies for safety violations. Less than a third of that money has been collected, a trend which is getting significantly worse with each passing year. Recouping that money would more than make up for the deep budget cuts in the safety agency, which has lost more than 170 positions over the past five years.

Team Bush set up the scenario by which the 12 miners were killed. But along with flying planes into buildings, this is likely another case where – if asked to take responsibilty – they would simply say, “Who could have ever imagined such a thing could happen?” We need a president with a little better imagination. And a lot less profit motive.

Bush Is One Heck of a President

Tin horn’s tin ear : Very few of the truisms foisted onto the public about President Bush are actually true, but there is one thing I believe about the president: He doesn’t watch TV. He especially doesn’t watch clips of himself because if he did, he would not say things like this:

I will tell you, the contrast between when I was last here and today, Stephen, is pretty dramatic. It may be hard for you to see, but from when I first came here to today, New Orleans is reminding me of the city I used to come to visit. It’s a heck of a place to bring your family. It’s a great place to find some of the greatest food in the world and some wonderful fun. And I’m glad you got your infrastructure back on its feet. I know you’re beginning to welcome citizens from all around the country here to New Orleans. And for folks around the country who are looking for a great place to have a convention, or a great place to visit, I’d suggest coming here to the great — New Orleans.

And this – which he said earlier that same day:

[The] truth of the matter is, the person who deserve the biggest compliment, in my judgment, is the man who brought the will of the Mississippi people, the needs of the Mississippi people up to Washington and fashioned one heck of a piece of legislation for the people of this important state — thank you, Governor [Haley Barbour (R-MS)], for your hard work

For Now, Anyway

In April 2004, while discussing the Patriot Act, Bush remarked that the administration does not conduct wiretaps on Americans without court approval. When that “fibbing” was exposed, Bush complained about the “shameful” leak to the Times, adding that “the fact that we’re discussing this program is helping the enemy.” Actually, the fact that we’re discussing it means we live in a democracy.

The Week, Jan. 11, 2006

Recess Appointment Just Another Example of Bush’s Cronyism

Heckuva job: George Bush’s appointment of 36-year-old Julie Myers to the post of head of the Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, is another example of his penchant for appointing unqualified cronies. And, the fact that it was a recess appointment, and thereby skirts the Senate confirmation process, indicates that his advisors recognized that Myers likely wouldn’t have made the cut.

According to GovExec.com, Myers has some good connections — her daddy is former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Richard Myers and her husband is chief of staff for Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.

So what qualifies her to head the second-largest federal law enforcement agency with 15,000 employees and an annual budget of $4 billion? She previously worked in the departments of Treasury, Commerce and Justice, and — here’s the ghost of Harriet Meiers — most recently served as a special assistant to Bush.

To try and combat appointments of incompetent political cronies (remeber Michael Brown aka Brownie?), Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii) has introduced legislation that sets standards of experience for high-level appointees to positions requiring Senate confirmation.

That’s all well and good, but when the incompetence starts at the top with the president, it’s going to be nigh on impossible to keep it out of the lower ranks.