McCain Spiritual Adviser Recants Earlier Statement That God Damned New Orleans with Katrina

John McCain’s spiritual adviser, John Hagee, has apparently gotten the word from on high and has now recanted his assertions that Katrina was God’s curse on New Orleans because it hosted an annual gay event:
“Ultimately neither I nor any other person can know the mind of God concerning Hurricane Katrina. I should not have suggested otherwise.”
— Hagee

“As a believing Christian, I see the hand of God in everything that happens here on earth, both the blessings and the curses. But ultimately neither I nor any other person can know the mind of God concerning Hurricane Katrina. I should not have suggested otherwise. No matter what the cause of the storm, my heart goes out to all who suffered in this terrible tragedy. There but for the grace of God go any one of us.”

Hagee first declared that God damned New Orleans in September 2006:

“I believe that New Orleans had a level of sin that was offensive to God, and they are — were recipients of the judgment of God for that. The newspaper carried the story in our local area that was not carried nationally that there was to be a homosexual parade there on the Monday that the Katrina came. And the promise of that parade was that it was going to reach a level of sexuality never demonstrated before in any of the other Gay Pride parades.” He later added, “I believe that the Hurricane Katrina was, in fact, the judgment of God against the city of New Orleans.”

Just last week Hagee reaffirmed this assertion:

HAGEE: The topic of that day was cursing and blessing. Moses taught in the book of Deuteronomy that everything in life is either a blessing or a curse. There are days that things happen that at the time look like a curse. In the passing of time, they may become what appears to be a blessing. An illustration is Joseph, when he was sold into slavery it looked like a curse, it looked like the worse day of his life. When his brothers came into Egypt looking for food, what looked like a bad day 13 years before turned out to be a blessed day. What happened in New Orleans looked like the curse of God, in time if New Orleans recovers and becomes the pristine city it can become it may in time be called a blessing. But at this time it’s called a curse.

The timing of Hagee’s statement on April 22 was embarrassing for McCain because it pulled focus from his campaign stop in New Orleans two days later.

Hagee is best known for espousing the belief that the Catholic Church is the Whore of Babylon referred to in the Book of Revelation.

Pennsylvania Didn’t Change Anything

Clinton’s 10-delegate net* wasn’t the only the underwhelming result of the Pennsylvania primary. One poll shows she’s not getting much of a boost in popularity either. Rasmussen Daily Tracking for today:

Rasmussen: “So far, there is absolutely no indication that Clinton’s victory in Pennsylvania has changed the overall dynamic of the race”

In the race for the Democratic Presidential Nomination, it’s Obama 49 percent, Clinton 42 percent. Those numbers are unchanged from the night before and, so far, there is absolutely no indication that Clinton’s victory in Pennsylvania has changed the overall dynamic of the race. These results are based upon a four-day rolling average and include two full nights of polling following the Pennsylvania Primary.

These results and other data suggest that there is no “momentum” in this Primary Season. Typically, momentum results as voters learn more about a candidate who is doing well. This cycle, Hillary Clinton began the campaign as one of the best known people in the world. Democrats uneasy with her quickly settled on Obama as the chief challenger who has now become the frontrunner.

As the candidates have become known, each has developed a solid core of supportive constituencies. For Obama, these included African-Americans, younger voters, more liberal Democrats, and upper-income voters. For Clinton, strength comes from White Women, older voters, more moderate Democrats, and lower-to-middle income workers.

Six weeks of campaigning in Pennsylvania, and still uncounted millions of dollars in campaign spending, was unable to significantly move any of the demographic support groups from one candidate to the other.

HRC’s unfavorables aren’t dropping either.

Among all voters nationwide, McCain is viewed favorably by 52 percent and unfavorably by 46 percent. Obama’s ratings are 50 percent favorable and 48 percent unfavorable. For Clinton, the reviews are 46 percent favorable, 53 percent unfavorable. Just 41 percent of Clinton supporters have a favorable opinion of Obama while 48 percent of Obama supporters have a favorable opinion of Clinton.


* Clinton won a total of 83 delegates from Pennsylvania while Obama won 73.

Poll: Americans Rate Dem Prez Campaign a Too

thumb-down-icon.jpgAs in too long, too negative and too dull. That’s the finding of a new Pew Center poll that measured voters’ attitudes toward the presidential race compared with a survey Pew performed in February. Looks like the campaign is tanking fast:

Half of those surveyed say the campaign has become too negative, up from 28 percent who said so in mid-February. The increase has been especially rapid among Democrats — 50 percent say it’s too negative, while only 19 percent thought so in February.

The contest between Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton turned especially heated in the weeks before Tuesday’s primary in Pennsylvania, which Clinton won. She criticized Obama for saying small-town residents who are bitter about their economic hardships cling to guns and religion, while Obama accused her of being too close to special interests.

Even so, Democrats have been turning out in record numbers to vote in the primaries.

Despite that, 65 percent said the campaign has gone on too long, up from 57 percent in February.

Thirty-five percent think it is too dull, compared to 25 percent two months ago. About four in 10 Republicans find the campaign boring, compared to a quarter of Democrats.

Fla. Dems Mount Feeble Feeney Fight

It is always with a sense of trepidation, if not outright dread, that I open an e-mail from Florida Democratic Party Chair Karen Thurman. One cringes just imagining what stupid stuff the FDP has come up with this time. Today’s electro-missive from Tallahassee was a doozy.

Seems the party is going after Republican Rep. Tom Feeney who represents District 24, which covers a broad swath of Central Florida, including Orlando and Brevard County, where it is illegal — illegal — to wear a thong bikini on the beach.

You might remember Feeney for his association with jailed uber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Jack took Tom and a bunch of buddies in a chartered plane to Scotland to play golf at the venerable St. Andrews course. The always-generous Abramoff paid for Feeney’s expenses, including lavish dinners and accommodations with fistfuls of tainted lobby dollars. The House Ethics Committee eventually made Feeney pay nearly $6,000 to cover his expenses for the trip.

In September 2006, Feeney was named one of the 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The organization said Feeney’s ethics issues arise from trips he has taken in violation of House travel and gift rules, and his failure to disclose his ownership of rental property.

OK, so Feeney is an appropriate target for political action and he really needs to be run out of Congress on a rail. But puh-leeze, Karen and krew, can’t you mount an intelligent, savvy, effective campaign against him? Apparently not.

First, they create an on-line advertisement that is sophomoric and ineffectual.

feeney-ad.jpg

Then they put up an anti-Feeney Web site that is poorly designed and ineffectual.

Then they fill the Web site with ineffectual content in the form of seven “questions.” These”questions” are in the form of badly written press releases that, well here’s a sample:

“Can we trust Florida’s most corrupt politician to be honest about his golf score at St. Andrews? Or did Abramoff let Feeney get away with a few mulligans, gimme-putts, and lost balls?” Florida Democratic Party spokesman Mark Bubriski said. “Other than illicit relationships with crooks, we still don’t know Tom Feeney’s handicap. But we hope he enjoyed his golf trip, since those 18 rounds in Scotland may prove to be the fatal stroke of his career in Congress.”

That appears to be an attempt at snarkiness, but instead it devolved into a kind of dumb-sounding playground-level taunt. Maybe that kind of discourse is effective in Talla-sassy, but that dog won’t hunt in more sophisticated parts of Florida. Like Apopka.

Maybe there will come a time when the Florida Democratic Party gets savvy and sophisticated, and really figures out this politics thing and becomes a true force against the Republicans in Florida. Yeah, I should live so long.

A Smart Bush? Jenna Says She Might Vote for a Democrat This Year

Appearing with her mother on Larry King’s show this week, first daughter Jenna Bush left open the possibility that she might not vote for John McCain in November:

KING: Do you have a favorite between the two, the two Democrats?

LAURA BUSH: My favorite is the Republican.

(LAUGHTER)

KING: Yours, too, I would imagine.

JENNA BUSH: I don’t know.

KING: A-ha. J. BUSH: But, I mean, you know —

KING: Are you open to —

J. BUSH: Yes, of course. I mean, who isn’t open to learning about the candidates? But, I mean, and I’m sure everybody is like that. But I really — I honestly have been too busy with books to really pay that much attention.

If Jenna were to support a Democrat this year, she would be the second daughter of a Republican president to switch parties so far. Earlier this week, the Associated Press reported that Julie Nixon Eisenhower, daughter of GOP Pres. Richard Nixon, had donated $2,300, the legal limit, to Barack Obama.

Susan Eisenhower, the granddaughter of GOP Pres. Dwight Eisenhower, is also an Obama supporter.

Ronald Reagan’s daughter, Patti Davis, came over from the dark side long ago but if she has announced whom she is supporting this year we missed it. However, she did write an article that was published in Newsweek last December, requesting that the midgets who were seeking the Republican nomination stop comparing themselves to her father.

GOP Congressional Candidate Seeks the Nazi Vote

zirkle.jpgIn his campaign for the congressional seat in Indiana’s 2nd District, Tony Zirkle says he’ll speak to any group that invites him. Even if they are neo-Nazis. Even if it’s Hitler’s birthday. Even if they are wearing swastika arm bands.

It happened Sunday, when Zirkle addressed the American National Socialist Workers Party in Chicago. Wait! Last time I checked, Chicago isn’t in Indiana. So not only does Zirkle not know much about geography, he claims not to know much about neo-Nazism:

Zirkle said he did not know much about the neo-Nazi group and that his intention was to talk on his concern about “the targeting of young white women and for pornography and prostitution.”

Sounds like he had a pretty good idea about his audience, which bills itself as “America’s Only Organization Struggling for the Interests of the White Working Class.” Of course, Zirkle’s local Republican Party leader was quick to disown the budding Brown Shirter:

“He certainly doesn’t hold the view of the of the Republican Party,” [Porter County Republican chairman Chuck] Williams said. “I don’t know why you would stand up in front of a picture of Adolf Hitler when millions of Americans fought against that kind of oppression.”

But this apparently is not new territory for the zany Zirkle:

The event was not the first time Zirkle has raised controversy on race issues. In March, Zirkle raised the idea of segregating races in separate states. Zirkle said Tuesday he’s not advocating segregation, but said desegregation has been a failure. “My primary purpose is to educate and inform,” he said.

I know what those Chicago haters learned from Zirkle last Sunday — that he’s one of their own.

Priest Bests O’Reilly Producer in Ambush Interview about Rev. Jeremiah Wright

This must-see video, which was posted at The BRAD BLOG, is a bit long but worth it. If you’re not familiar with Bill O’Reilly’s show on Fox News, you may not know that he sends a producer out a camera crew to ambush people in the news by asking them questions phrased to play into Fox’s rightwing propaganda — sort of like “When did you stop beating your wife?”

In this clip Michael Pfeger, a Catholic priest, is unrelenting in refusing to let the Fox dweeb pin him down — and if you watch it through to the end, he actually appears to silence O’Reilly’s goon.

Brad says O’Reilly was only able to use five seconds of this very long interview. In the unfair, unbalanced world of Fox News, that’s a win for the good guys.

A Call for Sheriff Judd to Apologize for Smearing Hate Crime Victim, Ryan Skipper

Thought I’d pass along this letter to the editor of a local paper in Polk County, Fla., from a couple who’d recently seen the documentary, Accessory to Murder, about the death in the county a year ago last month of Ryan Skipper:
“We are calling for the public apology to both the community and his family by Sheriff Grady Judd for his derogatory comments toward the victim, which were proved to be totally untrue.”
— Letter to editor of Polk County paper

Published: Saturday, April 19, 2008
Sheriff Judd Should Apologize

Monday night we had the privilege of viewing [Accessory to Murder] the documentary of the brutal murder of Ryan Skipper.

We are calling for the public apology to both the community and his family by Sheriff Grady Judd for his derogatory comments toward the victim, which were proved to be totally untrue.

We expect him to be accountable for his homophobic statements.

[Names Were Published in Newspaper But Are Withheld Here]
Lakeland

As Trish (who was interviewed in the documentary), Buck and I dug into the hate-crime murder of Ryan Skipper last spring, the people we encountered in Polk County, Fla., were all intelligent, engaged and kind-hearted — this was especially so among Ryan’s family and friends.

However, these good folks appear to be overwhelmingly out-numbered by yahoos who support Sheriff Grady Judd, a Christian ideologue who loves media attention and who thought nothing of smearing Ryan, who was killed because he was gay, within hours of his murder.

Judd made news lately by releasing the infamous cheerleader beating video (and other evidence) to the world, and thus risking the outcome of the trial in the matter.

We’ve been waiting for over a year now for Grady Judd to apologize to Ryan’s family — or to be held accountable by his constituents for his callous and unprofessional statements. Maybe it will happen some day.