Should Obama be Thanking Hillary Clinton?

There’s no question that Hillary Clinton’s win at any cost strategy is drawing some blood from Barack Obama. But could there be an up side to that? Maybe.

It’s better to get the Hillary-level crap out of the way now than later

GOP operatives are intently watching the Democratic primary fight to see how to push Obama’s buttons. They also hope Obama’s missteps and losses have alienated key general election constituencies – or at least planted negative impressions with them that will last into the fall…

Already, Republicans are testing a theory that Obama could be a liability for Democrats down-ballot, running ads in special congressional races that linked the Democratic candidate to Obama in hopes of helping the Republican candidate.

It didn’t work in Louisiana. The Democrat, Don Cazayoux, won Saturday anyway. Underscoring the GOP’s challenge this year, Democrats won the seat that Republicans have held since 1974.

If being associated with Obama didn’t sink a candidate’s ship, and even helps, then how much trouble was Obama really in? And as the article also points out, it would be unrealistic to expect someone’s first run for president to be flawless. Better to get the Hillary-level crap out of the way now than later.

“It hasn’t been a great couple weeks, but some of these problems were going to emerge anyway, and it’s better that it happened now than in the fall,” said Mark Mellman, a Democratic pollster who worked for Kerry’s campaign and is unaligned in the primary. He said Obama has gone through a “learning period” and that will benefit him in fall if he is the nominee.

Added Erik Smith, a Democrat and former aide to Dick Gephardt: “There’s something to be said for getting this stuff behind him, and not having any October surprises.”

I guess we have something to thank Hillary for after all.

Dem Senate Candidates Debate in N.C. – Winner in Tomorrow’s Primary Will Take on Sen. Liddy Dole

Sen. Elizabeth Dole is up for reelection this year, and the combination of her underwhelming performance over the past six years and the general bad odor emanating from the Republican Party of late makes her particularly vulnerable. (A longtime resident of the Watergate apartments in Washington, D.C., Dole has also irked many of her constituents by failing to spend much time on the ground in North Carolina. She grew up in Salisbury but has not been a full-time resident of the state since the 1960s.)
Dole has also irked many of her constituents by failing to spend much time on the ground in North Carolina. She grew up in Salisbury but has not been a full-time resident of the state since the 1960s.
After a lot of debating about holding a debate, the five Democrats running to square off against Dole met in Greensboro last week. The candidate with the lead in the polls is Kay Hagan, a state senator from Greensboro. Her most competitive challenger is Jim Neal, a corporate financial adviser from Chapel Hill.

Hagan … said she believes any Democrat has a good chance of defeating Dole in the November election. But she vowed to be that candidate, contrasting herself with Dole on issues such as the minimum wage, financial aid for students and veterans benefits.

Neal repeatedly tried to engage Hagan during the hour-long debate moderated by students on the University of North Carolina at Greensboro’s Spartan TV. And while Hagan tried to focus her responses on Dole, she also contrasted herself with her Democratic competitors, including Lumber-ton attorney Marcus Williams and Moncure podiatrist Howard Staley. [Duskin Lassiter, a Lexington trucker, did not participate.]

Hagan, contrary to the other three candidates on stage, would not dismiss the possibility of drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as a way to soften soaring gas prices — an idea often proposed by Republicans but rejected by congressional Democrats.

“I think that’s an issue of a cost-benefit ratio,” Hagan said. “You’ve got to look at how much oil is there, how long it will last and what is the risk from an environmental standpoint. I will really study the cost-benefit analysis.”

The veteran lawmaker said the more urgent priority was finding alternative sources of energy. She also advocated eliminating incentives for oil companies.

Neal … immediately said he opposes drilling in Alaska, suggesting the nation should tap into the nation’s large strategic petroleum reserve first. President Bush favors continuing pumping oil into the reserve in case of an international disruption in oil markets.

“I don’t believe we can begin talking about plundering our natural environment in order to generate more oil on the marketplace,” said Neal, an entrepreneur.

Williams cited data indicating the oil in the wildlife refuge would take years to develop and do little to influence gas prices. Staley said drilling for oil and would only continue a cycle of President Bush’s energy policy, which he dubbed “Drill until you’re sick. Get all the oil out of the earth you can.”

“It’s only led to more consumption and more pollution,” Staley said.

But do the Democrats have a chance of taking Dole’s seat this year? Despite the fact that Dole occupies the seat once held by Sen. Jesse Helms, and Republican Richard Burr won the other seat when Democrat John Edwards decided not to run for reelection in 2004 when he was John Kerry’s running mate, the answer is yes.

While North Carolina has been a reliable red state in every presidential elections since 1976, Democrats have historically done well in state races. North Carolina has had a Democratic governor in six out of the last eight terms, and Democrats control both houses of the legislature.

Polls: N.C. Voters Trend toward Clinton, But It’s Unlikely She’ll Close the Gap – Indiana Looks Tight

The punditosphere is correct that even if Hillary Clinton wins every primary between now and June 3, she won’t accrue enough delegates to win the nomination. Still, in the unlikely event she were to win both the North Carolina and Indiana primaries tomorrow, it could shake up the race again:

A new USA Today poll out Monday suggested that Obama, vowing to become America’s first black president, had been damaged by the fallout of racially tinged remarks by his former pastor Jeremiah Wright.

For the first time in three months, the former first lady led her rival in the survey of national Democrats, by seven percentage points. Two weeks ago before the latest storm over Wright hit, Obama was up 10 points.

A new CBS/New York Times poll on Sunday however suggested Obama had started to recover from the Wright furor, giving him an 11-point lead over Republican candidate McCain, 51-40.

Last Tuesday, that hypothetical matchup had been tied. Clinton led McCain in the same poll by 12 points.

Another poll, by Suffolk University in Indiana, showed the New York senator leading Obama in the state by six points 49 percent to 43 percent…

Obama still led in another battleground, North Carolina, where Clinton and her husband former president Bill Clinton have been campaigning feverishly.

A Zogby tracking survey had the Illinois senator up by eight in the state, much lower than the 20 point lead he had enjoyed in some polls just weeks ago. Zogby had the race in Indiana a mathematical tie.

Another source reports that the Zogby poll gives Obama a sizable lead in North Carolina but shows his numbers wobbling, along with a 5 point uptick for Clinton:

  • Apr 30 – May 1: Obama – 50 percent, Clinton – 34 percent
  • May 1 – May 2: Obama – 46 percent, Clinton – 37 percent
  • May 2 – May 3: Obama – 48 percent, Clinton – 39 percent

The Zogby numbers show roughly 10 percent of N.C. voters are undecided. In recent primaries, undecided voters have mostly broken for Clinton.

Quote du Jour

Free speech is about as good a cause as the world has ever known. But, like the poor, it is always with us and gets shoved aside in favor of things which seem at some given moment more vital. Everybody favors free speech in the slack moments when no axes are being ground.

— Heywood Broun (1888-1939), American sportswriter, newspaper columnist, and editor

Oprah Left Wright’s Church Over Concerns about Message

At the core of GOP attacks on Barack Obama this fall in the controversy over remarks by Rev. Jeremiah Wright will be the issue of judgment. Just as liberals criticized conservatives for exercising poor judgment when they remained members of private clubs that excluded African-Americans, Jews and women, the GOP attack machine will say that Obama exercised poor judgment by remaining a member of Wright’s congregation at Trinity Church for 20 years, even though Wright espoused beliefs like his assertion that HIV was a bioweapon developed by the U.S. government targeted at African-Americans.
“She’s been around black churches all her life, so Reverend Wright’s anger-filled message didn’t surprise her. But it just wasn’t what she was looking for in a church.”
— Friend of Oprah

Now Newsweek is reporting that Oprah Winfrey, who joined Trinity Church in 1984, stopped attending about 10 years ago, in part because of concerns over Rev. Wright’s message:

Winfrey was never comfortable with the tone of Wright’s more incendiary sermons, which she knew had the power to damage her standing as America’s favorite daytime talk-show host. “Oprah is a businesswoman, first and foremost,” said one longtime friend, who requested anonymity when discussing Winfrey’s personal sentiments. “She’s always been aware that her audience is very mainstream, and doing anything to offend them just wouldn’t be smart. She’s been around black churches all her life, so Reverend Wright’s anger-filled message didn’t surprise her. But it just wasn’t what she was looking for in a church.” Oprah’s decision to distance herself came as a surprise to Wright, who told Christianity Today in 2002 that when he would “run into her socially … she would say, ‘Here’s my pastor!’ ” (Winfrey declined to comment. A Harpo Productions spokesperson would not confirm her reasons for leaving the church.)

But Winfrey also had spiritual reasons for the parting. In conversations at the time with a former business associate, who also asked for anonymity, Winfrey cited her fatigue with organized religion and a desire to be involved with a more inclusive ministry. In time, she found one: her own. “There is the Church of Oprah now,” said her longtime friend, with a laugh. “She has her own following.”

The Obama campaign hopes that the Wright controversy will be old news by the time the campaign in the general election begins in September. That’s possible, unless there are more revelations like this one to come.

Our Man in N.C. Reports on the Bickerin’ Republicans

This is the final post from a friend in North Carolina who has been monitoring the buildup to tomorrow’s presidential primary and giving us a Wilmington-eye view on the campaign. Thanks Mike!

With just a few days to go before the North Carolina primary, it’s not surprising that almost everybody here in Wilmington is talking politics. We hear a lot about Democrats bickering, but my guess is a lot of Republicans are bickering too. And it’s not just about McCain being too liberal (though my Republican friends here do view him as such).

nc.jpg

As one example, I stopped by an old friend’s house this week. Larry works at the local Goodyear tires. Teresa, his wife, is unemployed, but not looking for a job any more since she has become a grandmother and is busy with the grandkid. She’s bolting the Grand Old Party (literally, this year) to vote for Hillary. Her husband is seething about this: “She [Hillary] talks disrespectfully of President Bush. He’s our president and presidents deserve respect.” He looks at her with intensity when saying this.

But their kid is in the military (in Iraq last year, stationed in Hawaii now), Teresa doesn’t want any chance of him going back to Iraq. Plus, there’s that gender issue: “It’s time we had a woman in charge,” she says.

Larry spits back: “Mrs. Bill Clinton will not be in charge. It’s Bill Clinton’s third presidency!”

“Oh,” I interject innocently, “you’d rather have Obama?”

My son is with me, so Larry tones down his terminology when he replies that “America is not ready to vote for a black man.” He does not use the “N word,” though in other company he would perhaps do so.

The next day I had lunch with Ron, a home repair guy who pretty much says the same thing about Americans never voting for a black man. Maybe blue-collar folk are the true elitists in our country.

Anyhow, as for the campaign itself, I kind of see what Larry means about Mrs. Bill Clinton, just because Mr. Hillary Clinton is so much in evidence, doing a spectacular job of campaigning at the local level. On one day alone he made 12 stops in Carolina towns, with highlights of his address airing on newscasts throughout the state.

His stump speech is about 25 minutes; he takes no questions from the audience or press, but revels in speaking to the common people. They applaud and he moves onto the next town. The crowds are large and enthusiastic — proud that an ex-president has come to their small town.

To me, Bill Clinton conjures images of that old populist William Jennings Bryan, at least as he was portrayed by Fredric March in “Inherit The Wind.” Sounding much like Bryan railing against banks, railroads and Adlai Stevenson (an elitist from Illinois), Bill Clinton criticizes oil companies and elitists (though not mentioning Obama by name).

Following his failed runs for president, Bryan took to going from Southern town to Southern town with lucrative speaking engagements, raising the hopes of people by trashing Darwinism, hailing the of glory of America’s past and praising the common sense of small-town people.

For his part, Bill Clinton essentially calls for a return to the glory days of the ’90s, praising the wisdom of the people in the crowd and emphasizing Hillary’s common sense. “She got that by spending 14 years with the people in Arkansas,” he says with a kind of weird, ingratiating smile. “There’s not much difference between the good people of Arkansas and the good people of Carolina.” Wisely, no mention of Scranton or New York people this time around.

Anyhow, that’s my final Carolina primary update. Packing my bags and heading to Chicago for the summer, so you’ll have to rely on the professionals from now on.

Before leaving, I participated in early voting, expecting long lines, but finding none, just me, some black men (two bringing their kids) and old white women (taking a very long time to vote). I found the low turnout a little surprising because there are only two early voting places in Wilmington: one at the senior center, one at the government center. The latter is conveniently located near both the university and a strip club, so you’d think there’d be greater voter interest. However, as of Thursday morning at 11 a.m., neither of those demographics appeared to see any need to vote early, despite Senator Obama’s exhortations to do so during his rally in the Port City.

Latest on “The War Room” Clip. ABC Says Kantor Did Diss Indiana

The scene in question appears at about 4:45.

According to the man who started it all, Jake Tapper of ABC News, the clip that circulated the interwebs today (and was ignored by the mainstream media) from the movie, “The War Room” was accurate in at least part. Mickey Kantor, who claims otherwise on the Huffington Post, did say to James Carville as they looked over election results, “Look at Indiana, wait, wait – look at Indiana. 42-40. It doesn’t matter if we win. Those people are shit. Excuse me.”

Tapper also found old press clippings from when the movie was made.

When “The War Room” came out other folks interpreted Kantor to be impugning Indiana residents.

In The Washington Post’s review of the film in 1993, critic Desson Howe referred to “a Mickey Kantor comment about the people of Indiana (when it looks as though Clinton’s ahead in Dan Quayle’s state).”

And a 1995 story in the Sydney Morning Herald said that “As for the good folk of Indiana, they are still recovering from the 1993 documentary War Room, which revealed the grim truth behind the Clinton election campaign. It showed Mr Kantor bursting in on election night to tell other campaign staffers that incredibly, Mr Clinton was doing well even in Republican Indiana. ‘And those people are s—!’ he declared breathlessly.”

As to the other part of the film that is circulating today, the words used are much cloudier. One clip had Kantor saying, “How would you like to be a worthless white n****r?” like the folks in the Hoosier state. In the original film, it’s really not clear what Kantor said but “How’d you like to be —” is pretty audible while the end of the sentence is lost. All we know is that George Stephanopoulos shakes his head.

Who supplied the “clarified” version of the video is still not known. The (possibly too) obvious choice would be someone from the Obama campaign. The next suspect would be someone from the Clinton campaign trying to make the Obama campaign look bad. After that, who knows? Someone from McCain’s campaign?

The red flag to me is that someone recalled this teeny weeny Indiana reference from a 15-year-old documentary. Who would have such top of mind recall about a film on the ’92 Clinton campaign? I’ll stop but I hope someone gets to the bottom of all this before Tuesday.

McCain Accidentally Admits We Invaded Iraq for Oil

Gramps is losing it. John “Maverick” McCain accidentally told the truth and now he’s trying to spin it back into something that doesn’t make Bush look so bad. Good luck with that.

At issue was a comment he made at a town hall-style meeting Friday morning in Denver.

“My friends, I will have an energy policy that we will be talking about, which will eliminate our dependence on oil from the Middle East that will prevent us from having ever to send our young men and women into conflict again in the Middle East,” McCain said.

“Again”? As in, “We already went to war over oil?” I thought so! But Bush said it was because Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. I’m confused.

The expected GOP nominee sought to clarify his comments later, after his campaign plane landed in Phoenix. He said he didn’t mean the U.S. went to war in Iraq five years ago over oil.

“No, no, I was talking about that we had fought the Gulf War for several reasons,” McCain told reporters.

One reason was Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait, he said. “But also we didn’t want him to have control over the oil, and that part of the world is critical to us because of our dependency on foreign oil, and it’s more important than any other part of the world,” he said…

“The Congressional Record is very clear: I said we went to war in Iraq because of weapons of mass destruction,” he said.

Oil, weapons of mass destruction, same thing.

Obama Supporters Smear Clinton Adviser Mickey Kantor with Fake Video Four Days Before Indiana Primary

The rabidly pro-Obama Huffington Post is calling a video released today smearing informal Clinton adviser Mickey Kantor a fake:
“A review of the original copy of the 1993 film The War Room, from which the excerpt was taken is virtually inaudible. The sound suggests, if anything, that instead of saying ‘How would you like to be a worthless white n****r?’ Kantor says, ‘How would you like to be in the White House right now?'”
— Huffington Post

A former aide to President Bill Clinton, and current informal adviser to Sen. Hillary Clinton, expressed outrage and shock on Friday after a videotape from 1992 surfaced allegedly showing him describing Indianans as “white n—rs.”

Mickey Kantor, who served as campaign chairman during Clinton’s 1992 run for the White House and says he has offered help and advice to Sen. Clinton, insisted that the tape was a fraud and that he was exploring legal steps against the individual who posted it online.

“I’ve never used that word in my entire life, ever, under any circumstance, ever,” an angry Kantor told The Huffington Post, citing his and his parent’s work fighting for civil rights. “I have listened to [the video] and so have you. You can’t tell what it is I’m saying in that second sentence, you can’t decipher that.”

Indeed, a review of the original copy of the 1993 film The War Room, from which the excerpt was taken (around the 4:40 mark) is virtually inaudible. The sound suggests, if anything, that instead of saying “How would you like to be a worthless white n****r?” Kantor says, “How would you like to be in the White House right now?”

The director of the film, moreover, says that Kantor never uttered those words. “He does not say that. He does not say that,” D.A. Pennebaker told Ben Smith.

The cropped video, which spread through the Internet like wildfire on Friday morning, shows Kantor with fellow former Bill Clinton staffers James Carville and George Stephanopoulos discussing results from the general election. In the footage, Kantor approaches the two aides and says, “Look at Indiana — wait, wait, look at Indiana. 42-40. It doesn’t matter if we win, those people are shit.” That much seems true, though Pennebaker says Kantor was referring to the George H.W. Bush White House.

Interestingly, the video is no longer available on YouTube.

Update: Ben Smith at the conservative Politico.com has spoken with the director of “The War Room,” who confirms that Kantor never said the words in the doctored video:

[…]