The Daughter Factor: Presidential Wildcard

In my lifetime, daughters have had a higher profile in their father’s presidencies than sons. Let’s look back:

  • John Kennedy: Caroline
  • Lyndon Johnson: Lynda Bird and Luci Baines
  • Richard Nixon: Tricia and Julie
  • Gerald Ford: Susan
  • Jimmy Carter: Amy
  • Ronald Reagan: Maureen and Patti
  • Bill Clinton: Chelsea
  • The Current Occupant: Barbara and Jenna

And while there are notable exceptions — George H.W. Bush, whose sons need no discussion — most of these presidencies were shaped in no small part by the White House daughters. Yes, Carter, Ford, Kennedy, and Reagan had sons too, but it’s their daughters we most recall, and their daughters who help develop our perception of them as people.

So what effect, if any, does the Daughter Factor have on the current race? That’s hard to say. Barack Obama has only girls, two totally cute small ones. And while Meghan McCain, whose blog has helped her dad with youth cred, is the best known, she has a passel of siblings.

Meghan McCain

There are the children from his first marriage – Doug and Andy, from his first wife’s former marriage – whom he adopted when they were young, as well as a daughter, Sidney. Then there is the second family: Meghan, Jimmy, Jack, and the McCains’ adopted daughter, Bridget, 16, who became a target of dirty campaigning in the 2000 presidential race when she was portrayed as the child of an illicit union.

Meghan, 23, seems like most Republican 20-somethings, or at least a whole lot like the Bush twins, which is to say vacuous and self-absorbed and heavily made-up. Her blog is mostly pictures, filled in with little posts about travel, who wore what, and her iPod.

The Obamas — Malia, 9, and Sasha, 6 — have spent most of the campaign with their mom, Michelle. If a recent ABC interview by Robin Roberts is any indication, the girls would be a source of frequent “Awww” moments in an Obama White House. After taking to task Republican-backed ads which questioned Michelle’s patriotism, the Obamas discussed their daughters’ desire for the family to have a dog. The exchange can only be termed charming.

The Obama girls

Robin Roberts: “Have the girls, Malia and Sasha, have they gotten their dog?”

Barack Obama: “No dog yet. The dog — ”

Michelle Obama: “The deal on the dog is a year from now. Because what we know about raising a dog is you have to be pretty stable so you don’t drive your dog crazy. So we had a conversation around the dinner table about a month ago because this came up, ‘When is the dog coming?’ So we figured a year from now, in the spring, we would be settled one way or another and we shook on it.”

Barack: “And that we also had a year to test whether they are sufficiently responsible —”

Michelle: “They are responsible. Malia is responsible.”

Barack: “They’re responsible, for a 9- and a 6-year-old they’re responsible, but whether — ”

Robin Roberts: “That’s a daddy talking.”

Barack: “Whether they’re going to be responsible in the middle of winter to go walk that dog — ”

Michelle: “I’m going to take care of it.”

Barack: “— When it’s cold outside.”

Michelle: “We’re getting a dog. The dog is a done deal.”

Barack: “The dog’s a done deal. Who’s walking the dog, that’s what we’re concerned about.”

Michelle, looking at camera: “Babies, you’re getting a dog.”

You can watch the whole interview here.

[…]

Maddow Skewers McCain’s Gay Marriage Alternative – Allowing ‘People To Enter into Legal Agreements’


“[McCain told Ellen] that even though she‘s gay, she should be allowed to sign her name like an adult … Next thing, he‘ll say gay people should be allowed to drive and keep pets.”
— Rachel Maddow

John McCain humiliated himself on Ellen DeGeneris’ show this week when he said he opposes gay marriage but is in favor of permitting gay people to “enter into legal agreements.”

ELLEN DEGENERES, “ELLEN”: I‘m, obviously, excited and to me this is only fair and only natural and what are your thoughts?

MCCAIN: Well, my thoughts are that I think that people should be able to enter into legal agreements. I just believe in the unique status of marriage between man and woman.

On MSNBC’s Countdown last night, openly gay Air America host Rachel Maddow hilarilously ridiculed McCain’s paternalism:

[…]

Quote du Jour

“Imagine a world in which generations of human beings come to believe that certain films were made by God or that specific software was coded by him. Imagine a future in which millions of our descendants murder each other over rival interpretations of Star Wars or Windows 98. Could anything — anything — be more ridiculous? And yet, this would be no more ridiculous than the world we are living in.”

— Sam Harris (1967 – ), author, The End of Faith, Letter to a Christian Nation

Poll: 52% of Californians Disapprove of Gay Marriage Legalization; 54% Support Anti-Marriage Constitutional Amendment

graph-poprll-gapry-maprriage-LAT

Although it is disappointing that slightly more than half of Californians disapprove of the state supreme court decision that overturned the ban on gay marriage, this represents a significant deflation of opposition from 2000, when a ballot initiative banning gay marriage passed with 61 percent of the vote.
Ballot initiatives that pass usually start with higher favorability in polling than 54 percent, which means there is a good chance this measure can be defeated.
The new Los Angeles Times poll found that:

By bare majorities, Californians reject [by 52 percent] the state Supreme Court’s decision to allow same-sex marriages and back [by 54 percent] a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at the November ballot that would outlaw such unions, a Los Angeles Times/KTLA Poll has found.

But the survey also suggested that the state is moving closer to accepting nontraditional marriages, which could create openings for supporters of same-sex marriage as the campaign unfolds.

More than half of Californians said gay relationships were not morally wrong, that they would not degrade heterosexual marriages and that all that mattered was that a relationship be loving and committed, regardless of gender.

Overall, the proportion of Californians who back either gay marriage or civil unions for same-sex couples has remained fairly constant over the years. But the generational schism is pronounced. Those under 45 were less likely to favor a constitutional amendment than their elders and were more supportive of the court’s decision to overturn the state’s current ban on gay marriage. They also disagreed more strongly than their elders with the notion that gay relationships threatened traditional marriage.

If the out-of-state political operatives behind the ballot initiative were hoping to help deliver California to John McCain in November, they may have miscalculated:

Responding to a separate question, only 10 percent of registered voters said that gay marriage was the most important issue facing the state, although more than 5 in 10 voters characterized it as important, just not the most important. Another third of voters said it was not important at all.

Among those who felt it was the most important, more than 6 in 10 were conservatives or those who consider themselves part of the Republican religious base. They were overwhelmingly voting for McCain, the poll found.

Ballot initiatives that pass usually start with higher favorability in polling than 54 percent, which means there is a good chance this measure can be defeated.

Homophobic High School Principal Resigns When School Opens Gay-Straight Alliance

Good riddance:

Irmo High School Principal Eddie Walker’s has announced he’ll resign effective June 2009 over the creation of a Gay-Straight Alliance club at the school.

But for one group, June 2009 isn’t soon enough.

South Carolina Equality is demanding that either Walker’s resignation be effective immediately, or he be terminated.

“This Principal has emphatically and publicly stated that he does not support a significant portion of his student body. He has created an atmosphere where intolerance is considered a principled stand,” says SCE Executive Director C. Ray Drew.

The group says research shows 80 percent of gay students do not know a single supportive adult at their school, 38 percent of gay students face hostility and violence, and 18 percent of gay students experience physical assault.

“Eddie Walker has created a liability problem for the school. If a gay student is harmed, the District could be held accountable for creating a hostile school environment,” says Drew. “Every day that this Principal remains at Irmo High, students will continue to live in fear for their safety. These unsafe and dangerous conditions for gay students are intolerable. ”

So far, Lexington School District Five has not commented on the group’s demands.

A man this ignorant should not be in charge of the education of young people.

Kevin Wuzzardo, a morning anchor on the ABC affiliate in Wilmington, N.C., and an alumnus of Irmo High School, says he finds Walker’s stance to be an embarrassment for the school:

[…]

Polls: Clinton Ahead of McCain in Florida, Obama Trails

To win the presidency, Barack Obama will need to take all the states John Kerry won in 2004, plus either Florida or Ohio. At the moment, Florida is not looking good for him:

The latest polls, though, show Clinton would be the stronger candidate in Florida in November against John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee.

The Quinnipiac University Polling Institute and Rasmussen Reports, in results released Wednesday and Thursday, show Obama would lose to McCain in Florida. Clinton, though, would beat McCain in the state.

The Rassmussen poll shows Clinton would defeat McCain 47 percent to 41 percent. Quinnipiac has it 48-41 Clinton.

The Rassmussen poll shows McCain would defeat Obama 50 percent to 40 percent. The Quinnipiac numbers show McCain would beat Obama, 45-41.

The good news is Obama’s numbers tend to go up significantly in areas where he spends time campaigning. Until this week, because of the early primary controversy, he hadn’t spent much time in Florida. Let’s hope he camps out there over the summer.

Obama Floats Punishment for Florida: Cut Delegation in Half

Now that Barack Obama is officially the pre-presumptive Democratic nominee, he’s going to have to decide what to do about “punishing” Florida and Michigan for moving their primaries too close to the sacred lead spots held by Iowa and New Hampshire.
Obama should undo what mean Dr. Dean threatened to do and seat the entire delegations.
In Florida yesterday, he floated this idea:

Delving deeper into Florida’s Democratic delegate debacle than he ever has to date, Sen. Barack Obama said Wednesday that “a very reasonable solution” would be to count Florida’s disputed primary votes and cut the state’s delegation to the convention in half.

That may be a bit too Solomonic. Cutting the baby in half risks making everybody involved half unhappy. Obama has misjudged the mood among “average Floridians” about this issue:

The Illinois senator, just shy of securing the nomination, stressed that he intends to win Florida and doubted the controversy over Florida’s primary would cause any serious damage to his prospects.

“I don’t think that the average Floridian is spending all their time thinking about this,” he said, as his campaign bus cruised from Tampa to Kissimmee.

“I think what they’re thinking about is $4-per-gallon gas. I think what they’re thinking about is ‘my health care premiums have gone up 25 percent and my deductibles have gone up and I’m trying to hang on to the health care that I’ve got.”’

We are going to need all the happy Democrats in Florida we can muster in November. Since Obama will win the delegate count even if Clinton gets her larger shares in Florida and Michigan, he should countermand mean Dr. Dean and seat both delegations.

Richard Dreyfuss to Play Cheney in Oliver Stone Bush Biopic

Good choice:

[Actor] Richard Dreyfuss doesn’t seem like the sort to be afraid of a little political retribution. And it’s a good thing, too — because the white-haired star of The American President is about to sign on as the notorious American vice president in Oliver Stone’s new film, simply called W. This follows on the heels of three other crack casting choices: amazing Jeffrey Wright as Colin Powell, squinty Scott Glenn as Rumsfeld, and hilariously weaselly Rob Corddry as hilariously weaselly White House press secretary Ari Fleischer.

House Committee Subpoenas Rove in Siegelman Case

House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers announced this afternoon that a
subpoena has been issued to Karl Rove in the Don Siegelman case:

Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) issued a subpoena to former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove for testimony about the politicization of the Department of Justice (DOJ), including former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman’s case. Yesterday, Rove’s attorney, Robert Luskin, sent a letter to the Committee expressing that Rove would not agree to testify voluntarily, per the Committee’s previous requests.

“It is unfortunate that Mr. Rove has failed to cooperate with our requests,” Conyers said.

“Although he does not seem the least bit hesitant to discuss these very issues weekly on cable television and in the print news media, Mr. Rove and his attorney have apparently concluded that a public hearing room would not be appropriate. Unfortunately, I have no choice today but to compel his testimony on these very important matters.”

Separately, Chairman Conyers recently received a letter from DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) indicating that the office has opened an investigation into allegations of selective prosecution of Siegelman and others.

The BRAD BLOG has links to pertinent documents, including full text of the subpoena and letters to and from Rove’s lawyer.

Book Review: Ravens in the Storm

Ravens in the Storm: A Personal History of the 1960s Anti-War Movement, by Carl Oglesby; Scribner; 2008.

ravens.jpgOK, I’m a sucker for the 1960s, those halcyon hippie days of political foment, social struggle, free love and good music. I missed them, mostly, being just a kid at the time, though I did my best during late adolescence and early adulthood to live them, at least the sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll part.

So, when presented with an opportunity to review a book by one of the major players during some of the most turbulent days of the ’60s, I jumped at the chance. I’m glad I did.

“Ravens in the Storm” is at once an elegiac memoir, a chronicle of the inside workings of the antiwar movement and an apologia. There is a wistfulness about it, a sense of opportunities squandered and chances missed, but also a triumphant air that Carl Oglesby and his cohorts in the Students for a Democratic Society, or SDS movement, had actually, in the final analysis, accomplished something not achieved before or since. They made a difference at a critical time in our nation’s history that has eerily familiar parallels to today, as we live through another illegal, ill-advised and unwinnable war.

The similarities to the 1960s Vietnam War era and the current fiasco in Iraq are an undercurrent in “Ravens.” Oglesby never mentions our current conflict, leaving it to the reader to draw the unmistakable conclusions: a nation of sleepwalkers trusting in a corrupt government, a president with an unclear mission and a blank check, and a compliant Congress that failed to fulfill its constitutional responsibility to reign in an out-of-control administration.

Oglesby’s 1960s featured a government that lied to and spied on its citizens, a corrupt, profit-driven military-industrial complex; a country bent on nation-building in a faraway place of which we had and have little cultural or historical understanding, and little sympathy for the millions of lives destroyed in a horrific and pointless war. Sound familiar?

The difference is for Vietnam they had Carl Oglesby and the SDS, and the best we could manage for Iraq was Cindy Sheehan.

[…]