Bush’s Foiled Terror Plot Makes No Sense
Stupid terrorist: Today President Bush revealed that his anti-terrorist efforts had thwarted a plot to fly an airliner into a building in Los Angeles:
We now know that in October 2001, Khalid Shaykh Muhammad — the mastermind of the September the 11th attacks — had already set in motion a plan to have terrorist operatives hijack an airplane using shoe bombs to breach the cockpit door, and fly the plane into the tallest building on the West Coast. We believe the intended target was Liberty Tower in Los Angeles, California.
This makes absolutely no sense. How does a shoe bomber highjack a plane?
Wouldn’t a bomb used to “breach the cockpit door” do serious damage to the forward compartments, potentially de-stabilizing the plane?
And even if the bomb didn’t destroy the fuselage, after it explodes, the highjacker is weaponless and therefore no longer a threat.
So maybe there was another scenario — maybe the highjacker intended to use his shoe bomb as leverage to get the crew to comply with his demands:
Or let’s assume he gets into the cockpit:
The crew would have no reason to comply with the shoe bomber’s demands. What do they have to lose? They and the passengers are going to die in either case.
There is something missing in this story. Or the president lied.
Speaking of lying, the creepiest thing about President Bush is that we can never know for sure if he is prevaricating or merely an incompetent bungler.
In all of Los Angeles’ 500 squares miles, there is no “Liberty Tower,” which Mr. Bush identified as the target of the attack. Later in the day, the White House horse hockey brigade issued a correction: He meant the “Library Tower,” which is the former name of the city’s tallest building, now known as the US Bank Building.
Okay. Sounds straightforward. He bungled the name as he is wont to do. But isn’t his choice of words — “liberty” versus “library” — just too cute by half?
But was it a typical Bush malapropism — he just mangled “li-berry” for “liberty?” Or was it a subtle lie that enabled the president to utter a political keyword? As I’ve said before, I almost wish I believed he lied all the time, which would indicate cleverness, but I suspect he’s just the most incompetent person who has ever sat in the Big Chair.
Lastly, this is not the first plot we have heard of that targeted this building, so don’t expect anyone in Los Angeles to get too excited about the announcement today.



