Newspaper Uncovers Bush Conspiracy to Blame Environmentalists

The Sierra Club is directing people to this article in the Jackson, Miss. Clarion-Ledger:

Federal officials appear to be seeking proof to blame the flood of New Orleans on environmental groups, documents show.

Federal officials say the e-mail was prompted by a congressional inquiry but wouldn’t comment further.

The Clarion-Ledger has obtained a copy of an internal e-mail the U.S. Department of Justice sent out this week to various U.S. attorneys’ offices: “Has your district defended any cases on behalf of the (U.S.) Army Corps of Engineers against claims brought by environmental groups seeking to block or otherwise impede the Corps work on the levees protecting New Orleans? If so, please describe the case and the outcome of the litigation.”

Cynthia Magnuson, a spokeswoman for the Justice Department, said Thursday she couldn’t comment “because it’s an internal e-mail.”

…Federal officials say the e-mail was prompted by a congressional inquiry but wouldn’t comment further.

The Sierra Club has been refuting the Rovevelian/FOX News stories that Katrina’s damage is somehow the fault of environmentalists. But as is so often the case in Bushworld, the spin on their side translates into easy sound bites (The environmentalists are at fault. State and local government is at fault. There’s not enough proof of global warming.), whereas the facts take a minute or two to understand. And most of Bush’s followers’ attention spans are almost as short as his.

Whoever is behind the e-mail may have spotted the Sept. 8 issue of National Review Online that chastised the Sierra Club and other environmental groups for suing to halt the corps’ 1996 plan to raise and fortify 303 miles of Mississippi River levees in Louisiana, Mississippi and Arkansas.

The corps settled the litigation in 1997, agreeing to hold off on some work until an environmental impact could be completed. The National Review article concluded: “Whether this delay directly affected the levees that broke in New Orleans is difficult to ascertain.”

The problem with that conclusion?

The levees that broke causing New Orleans to flood weren’t Mississippi River levees. They were levees that protected the city from Lake Pontchartrain levees on the other side of the city.

When Katrina struck, the hurricane pushed tons of water from the Gulf of Mexico into Lake Pontchartrain, which borders the city to the north. Corps officials say the water from the lake cleared the levees by 3 feet. It was those floodwaters, they say, that caused the levees to degrade until they ruptured, causing 80 percent of New Orleans to flood.

[Sierra Club attorney David Bookbinder said the purpose of the litigation by the Sierra Club and others in 1996 was where the corps got the dirt for the project. “We had no objections to levees,” he said. “We said, ‘Just don’t dig film materials out of the wetlands. Get the dirt from somewhere else.’ ”

…In 1977, the corps wanted to build a 25-mile-long barrier and gate system to protect New Orleans on the east side. Both environmental groups and fishermen opposed the project, saying it would choke off water into Lake Pontchartrain.

After litigation, corps officials abandoned the idea, deciding instead to build higher levees. “They came up with a cheaper alternative,” Bookbinder said. “We didn’t object to raising the levees.”

John Hall, a spokesman for the corps in New Orleans, said the barrier the corps was proposing in the 1970s would only stand up to a weak Category 3 hurricane, not a Category 4 hurricane like Katrina. “How much that would have prevented anything, I’m not sure,” he said.

So who’s really to blame for Katrina’s devastation? You guessed it.

Although the Federal Emergency Management Agency in 2001 listed a hurricane striking New Orleans as one of the top three catastrophic events the nation could face (the others being a terrorist attack on New York City and an earthquake in San Francisco), funding for corps projects aimed at curbing flooding in southeast Louisiana lagged.

U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., has said the White House cut $400 million from corps’ requests for flood control money in the area.

Just remember, in Bushworld, all truth is lies, all peace is war, and all good is bad. Holding that thought is the only way to get through the insanity of this administration.


2 thoughts on “Newspaper Uncovers Bush Conspiracy to Blame Environmentalists”

  1. Rep. John Conyers has written a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales about the e-mail Gonzales has sent out. The letter has six points that require the AG to answer. Conyers said he was sad that the Administration would revert to this “Rovian” technique.

  2. When I was a kid, and I read DC comic books, Superman would occasionally visit Bizzaro World, where up was down, wrong was right and white was black. Under George W. Bush, America has become Bizzaro World.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.