Foley Scandal Could Stymie GOP’s Gay-Bashing Agenda
On Oct. 5, we reported about the list of closeted gay Republicans that is being circulated in political media circles. It is likely that the names will be made public before the election this year. This could do permanent damage to the Republican anti-gay agenda, which has been one of its most reliable tools for getting out the votes of the Christian right:
The importance of FoleyGate is that it shines a spotlight on the simple reality that the party with the loudest anti-gay voices is also the party that’s filled with gays on every level, from staff member to Congressman to, as rumored, chairman of the party itself.
For over a dozen years now Republicans have presented themselves to America as the party of ethics, morality and family values. They’ve spent incalculable time, money and political currency trying to pass discriminatory legislation–on both the federal and state levels–against gays. They’ve told us that straight is right and gay is wrong. That straight is Republican, and gay is a by-product of the loosey-goosey amoral Democratic Party. Those days are over.
The Foley scandal has proven to America that gay life is just as much a part of Republican life as it is in liberal circles. The only difference is that among conservatives it’s more closeted and repressed. And that fact gave Republicans a false justification to spew their hypocritical venom towards gays and make them the scapegoats for everything wrong with the fabric of American society. Their overall message? That being gay is a liberal problem, not a conservative one. Well, guess again. Foley, his former chief of staff Kirk Fordham, former House Clerk and Hastert appointee Jeff Trandahl (at the center of the Foley page scandal) and Rep. Jim Kolbe of Arizona are openly gay. There are rumors about Rep. David Dreier (R-CA), RNC Chair Ken Mehlman and others as well. The true long-term significance of FoleyGate is that it proves to Mr. and Mrs. Joe America that the elephant is just as gay as his donkey colleague.

When asked if his cigar was a phallic symbol, Sigmund Freud supposedly replied, “Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.” Implied in this answer, of course, is the idea that sometimes a cigar is more than a cigar: It is a symbol for something else.
