Day: April 20, 2009
Popular Stereotype Just Bit the Dust
Bad news for all the folks out there who see drug offenders as one color. Your stereotype just got blown out of the water by a new study that analyzes data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, FBI, and the Department of Health and Human Services for all 50 states.
For the first time in 25 years, since the inception of the “war on drugs,” the number of African Americans incarcerated in state prisons for drug offenses has declined substantially, according to a study released today by The Sentencing Project. It finds a 21.6% drop in the number of blacks incarcerated for a drug offense, a decline of 31,000 people during the period 1999-2005.
The study…also documents a corresponding rise in the number of whites in state prison for a drug offense, an increase of 42.6% during this time frame, or more than 21,000 people. The number of Latinos incarcerated for state drug offenses was virtually unchanged.
Less dependence on racial profiling is one element in the changing numbers, but another important one is the drugs themselves. Crack cocaine is on the downhill side of popularity, while methamphetamine use is still rising. Crack is traditionally associated with black users while meth seems to be more of trailer trash thing. Whoops, speaking of stereotypes.
Besides, there’s still plenty of bad news to go around.
While the number of persons in state prisons for a drug offense rose by less than 1% during the study period, the increase in federal prisons was more than 32%. These latter changes are attributed to ongoing aggressive enforcement of drug laws, including application of harsh mandatory sentencing policies. Despite declines in the use of crack cocaine, federal prosecution and incarceration levels for crack offenses remain high and have a stark racially disparate impact.
…despite the new trend, African Americans are still imprisoned at more than six times the rate of whites for all offenses. Moreover, high incarceration rates for low-level drug offenses remain a function of the largely punitive approach to drug abuse that has proven expensive and ineffective.
Why Do We Still Have Beauty Contests Anyway?
“We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. And you know what, I think in my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that’s how I was raised.”
— First Runner-Up Miss California in the Miss USA Pageant
“That is not the value of 95 percent of the people in this audience. Look around this audience and tell me how many gay men there are.”
— Pageant attendee, as quoted by the Associated Press during a shouting match in the lobby after the contest
Teabaggers’ Outrage over Innuendo Makes Their Cluelessness Even More Laughable
At some point on April 15, the day of the teabagging protests, rank and file Republicans who supported the movement, including some of the estimated 250,000 people who attended the meetings nationwide, were finally clued in to the fact that “teabagging” was a frat-boy double entendre for a sex act.
Brent Bozell
The moment of realization may have come that morning when party boss Rush Limbaugh informed his audience that “teabagging” had a second meaning that he couldn’t divulge on his “family program.” He encouraged them not to think about the unfortunate branding and its likely fatal consequences for their nascent movement but rather to “think of steeping” tea bags instead.
Observers of the tea bag movement had known about the double meaning for months, and as the day of the event approached, mockery of it in certain quarters — okay, on MSNBC — provided some much-needed comedic relief related to economic news after months of nothing but doom and gloom.
Here’s David Shuster, sitting in for Keith Olbermann, on MSNBC, on April 13:
It‘s going to be teabagging day for the right-wing and they‘re going nuts for it. Thousands of them whipped out the festivities early this past weekend, and while the parties are officially toothless, the teabaggers are full-throated about their goals.
They want to give President Obama a strong tongue-lashing and lick government spending — spending they did not oppose when they were under presidents Bush and Reagan. They oppose Mr. Obama‘s tax rates — which will be lower for most of them — and they oppose the tax increases Mr. Obama is imposing on the rich, whose taxes will skyrocket to a rate about 10 percent less than it was under Reagan. That‘s teabagging in a nut shell.
That it took so long for the teabaggers to realize their movement was being mocked just underscores their cluelessness.
On teabagging day — at the very moment it was too late to fix the problem — the GOP establishment sent its messagemeisters onto Fox News to try to shift blame for their own inept brand management onto the satirists who were mocking them:


