GOP Congressional Candidate Seeks the Nazi Vote

zirkle.jpgIn his campaign for the congressional seat in Indiana’s 2nd District, Tony Zirkle says he’ll speak to any group that invites him. Even if they are neo-Nazis. Even if it’s Hitler’s birthday. Even if they are wearing swastika arm bands.

It happened Sunday, when Zirkle addressed the American National Socialist Workers Party in Chicago. Wait! Last time I checked, Chicago isn’t in Indiana. So not only does Zirkle not know much about geography, he claims not to know much about neo-Nazism:

Zirkle said he did not know much about the neo-Nazi group and that his intention was to talk on his concern about “the targeting of young white women and for pornography and prostitution.”

Sounds like he had a pretty good idea about his audience, which bills itself as “America’s Only Organization Struggling for the Interests of the White Working Class.” Of course, Zirkle’s local Republican Party leader was quick to disown the budding Brown Shirter:

“He certainly doesn’t hold the view of the of the Republican Party,” [Porter County Republican chairman Chuck] Williams said. “I don’t know why you would stand up in front of a picture of Adolf Hitler when millions of Americans fought against that kind of oppression.”

But this apparently is not new territory for the zany Zirkle:

The event was not the first time Zirkle has raised controversy on race issues. In March, Zirkle raised the idea of segregating races in separate states. Zirkle said Tuesday he’s not advocating segregation, but said desegregation has been a failure. “My primary purpose is to educate and inform,” he said.

I know what those Chicago haters learned from Zirkle last Sunday — that he’s one of their own.

Quote du Jour

Older men declare war. But it is youth who must fight and die. And it is youth who must inherit the tribulation, the sorrow and the triumphs that are the aftermath of war.

— Herbert Hoover (1874-1964), 31st President of the United States

Poll: Bush Is Most Disliked President in Gallup Poll History

When comes to being unpopular, George W. Bush is not only an international trendsetter, he is a record breaker. Gallup has been polling on the approval rating of presidents since 1938, when Franklin Roosevelt was president, but in those seven decades, no president has been as unpopular as Bush has:
Among Republicans, 66 percent approve and 32 percent disapprove.

In a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll taken Friday through Sunday, 28 percent of Americans approve of the job Bush is doing; 69 percent disapprove. The approval rating matches the low point of his presidency, and the disapproval sets a new high for any president since Franklin Roosevelt.

The previous record of 67 percent was reached by Harry Truman in January 1952, when the United States was enmeshed in the Korean War.

(Bush also recently surpassed Truman as the president with the longest losing streak of unpopularity, having gone 39 months now without an approval rating over 50 percent, breaking Truman’s record of 38 months.)

The most disturbing number inside the Gallup poll is the tremendous support Republicans still give Bush, whose record over the seven years and three months he has been in office includes not a single accomplishment worth noting:

Views of Bush divide sharply along party lines. Among Republicans, 66 percent approve and 32 percent disapprove. Disapproval is nearly universal — 91 percent — among Democrats. Of independents, 23 percent approve, 72 percent disapprove of the job he’s doing.

Another record in the poll: 63 percent of Americans now say invading Iraq was a mistake.

Most Folks Think Most Leaders Suck at Their Jobs

OK, we live in democracies, so we determine who gets to be our leaders, right? Apparently, the whole democracy plan isn’t working out so well. Seems almost nobody approves of the job their leader is doing. Here’s a brief rundown of some of the world’s leaders and their current approval ratings:

George W. Bush, President of the United States: 28 percent

United States Congress: 23 percent

Nicholas Sarkozy, President of France: 36 percent

Gordon Brown, Prime Minister of Britain, 32 percent

Brendan Nelson, Australia’s Federal Opposition Leader, 7 percent

Hugo Chavez, Dictator of Venezuela, 30 percent

On the other hand, two guys who are not selected based on the popular vote are doing pretty well:

Pope Benedict XVI, God’s Rep on Earth, 70 percent

Vladimir Putin, Czar of Russia, 80 percent

Quote du Jour

Anybody who wants the presidency so much that he’ll spend two years organizing and campaigning for it is not to be trusted with the office.

— David Broder (1929- ), Washington Post political columnist

After Bush: Healing America Should Start with Release of Reagan Records on Iran-Contra and Saddam That Bush Suppressed in 2001

Writing in Artvoice, Michael I. Niman says that in order to begin healing the nation in the the aftermath of the Worst Presidency Ever, America will need to undergo a process of truth-telling next year not unlike the Truth and Reconciliation Commission hearings in South Africa after Apartheid ended a decade ago.
“George W. Bush spent most of 2001 using legal maneuvers to delay the release of records that would likely have incriminated key members of his administration as well as his father in crimes that took place two decades earlier.”
— Niman

The place to start, Niman suggests, is with the release of tens of thousands of documents from the Reagan-Bush presidency that George W. Bush suppressed by fiat during his first year in office.

Until Bush countermanded it, the Presidential Records Act required that the records of every administration be made public after 12 years, which meant that the Reagan-Bush documents were due for release after January 2001. In the same executive order, Bush also included the records from his father’s two terms as vice president — which was undoubtedly Bush Jr.’s true purpose all along.

First some background on the Reagan-Bush records from Niman:

There were two big unfolding stories pre-9/11 that just sort of disappeared. One was the completion of the first full recount of the disputed 2000 Florida presidential election—which Al Gore won, albeit by a hair…

The second, possibly larger story, was the scheduled declassification of the first batch of sealed records from the Reagan/Bush White House. Those records promised to further document massive crimes against both humanity and the Constitution, as well as treason committed by our leader’s father and the now revered Ronald Reagan.

Historians expected that among the 68,000 documents scheduled for release in 2001 would be further evidence of Reagan administration support for and coordination of terrorist attacks aimed at destabilizing the economy and democratically elected popular government of Nicaragua, not to mention support for death squads in El Salvador, Columbia and Honduras (Battalion 316), and genocide in Guatemala.

Juicier still, given the current situation in Iraq, would be additional data about Reagan/Bush support for Saddam Hussein’s government at a time when it was gassing its own citizens (allegedly with US supplied materials), and support for the mullahs in Iran, who, it turns out, the Reagan administration covertly supplied with arms (remember Ollie North?), allegedly in exchange for the continued imprisonment of the American embassy staff in the run-up to the 1980 presidential election. The incident left US President Jimmy Carter appearing impotent, leading to the Reagan/Bush victory, which was immediately followed by the release of the hostages and US arms shipments to Iran’s criminal regime. Throw in a draconian domestic agenda and we would have been looking at an interesting read.

George W. Bush spent most of 2001 using legal maneuvers to delay the release of records that would likely have incriminated key members of his administration as well as his father in crimes that took place two decades earlier. Once the nation moved into the post-9/11 era, the political opening emerged for W. to issue an unquestioned executive order (Exec. Order 13233) on November 1, 2001, quietly thwarting the release of the Reagan/Bush papers in the name of “national security.”

To restore America after the disastrous Bush presidency, Niman says that these and other truths must be revealed:

[…]

Hillary Clinton To Appear on Olbermann’s Show Monday Night

MSNBC newsreaders have announced that Hillary Clinton will be “going one on one” with Keith Olbermann on “Countdown” tonight. It should be very interesting because Olbermann is an outspoken admirer of the Clintons but has been unsparing in his criticism of the way the presidential campaign has been run this year.

Here on the Left Coast, “Countdown” is broadcast live at 5 p.m. and re-runs at 7 p.m.

Priest Bests O’Reilly Producer in Ambush Interview about Rev. Jeremiah Wright

This must-see video, which was posted at The BRAD BLOG, is a bit long but worth it. If you’re not familiar with Bill O’Reilly’s show on Fox News, you may not know that he sends a producer out a camera crew to ambush people in the news by asking them questions phrased to play into Fox’s rightwing propaganda — sort of like “When did you stop beating your wife?”

In this clip Michael Pfeger, a Catholic priest, is unrelenting in refusing to let the Fox dweeb pin him down — and if you watch it through to the end, he actually appears to silence O’Reilly’s goon.

Brad says O’Reilly was only able to use five seconds of this very long interview. In the unfair, unbalanced world of Fox News, that’s a win for the good guys.