Hartmann: It’s an ‘Occupation’ Not a ‘War’
Wars end in victory or surrender. Occupations end with withdrawals. Thom Hartmann made the point on his radio show this week that as long as the Republicans — and the media and even the Democratic candidates — continue to frame the Iraq occupation as a “war,” John McCain and other proponents of endless occupation will continue to falsely claim that leaving Iraq would be “surrendering to al Qaeda.”
Looking back on Bush’s adventure, it is increasingly clear that, even though it was called a war from the beginning, it has all the contours of an invasion and occupation. Our forces went in, routed the government, arrested and killed its leaders and installed a puppet regime, albeit by popular election. Except for the brief ground war after the invasion, there was nothing remotely like a traditional ground war.
Next month, we’ll mark the fifth year of the occupation. Unlike wars, Hartman pointed out, occupations are supposed to end. He may be right that the first small step toward withdrawing from this one may be reframing the debate.


