Year: 2007
Chris Matthews’ New Man Crush: Fred ‘K Street’ Thompson
Left: Bush with pilot on aircraft carrier in 2003. Right: Fred Thompson, the former K Street lobbyist
Chris Matthews, the host of “Hardball” on MSNBC, has a bad habit of developing man-crushes on tough-acting politicians. He’s just getting over one of these affairs of the heart, and is showing signs that him may be ready to get back on the pony of love and ride.
“Can you smell the English leather on this guy, the Aqua Velva, the sort of mature man‘s shaving cream, or whatever, you know, after he shaved? Do you smell that sort of — a little bit of cigar smoke?”
— Chris Matthews
— Chris Matthews
Like his former crush, the new one is a macho-acting Republican. And like the ex, he’s an obvious phony to anyone not smitten with him. Poor Chris. Here’s how he gushed over his new bff, the erstwhile presidential candidate, Fred Thompson:
MATTHEWS: Can you smell the English leather on this guy, the Aqua Velva, the sort of mature man‘s shaving cream, or whatever, you know, after he shaved? Do you smell that sort of — a little bit of cigar smoke? You know, whatever.
He has also recently flirted with Sen. John McCain, whose “jib” he said he liked (whereas about the New England preppie, Mitt Romney, Matthews said, “He’s got a nice chin, which I noticed.”)
Matthews’ long, lamented ex, of course, is Pres. George W. Bush. Here’s a snippet of Matthews’ perving on the president during the coverage of Bush’s landing on an aircraft carrier in a fighter jet, on May 1, 2003:
Here’s a president who’s really nonverbal. He’s like Eisenhower. He looks great in a military uniform. He looks great in that cowboy costume he wears when he goes West. I remember him standing at that fence with Colin Powell. Was [that] the best picture in the 2000 campaign?
And:
MATTHEWS: The president there — look at this guy! We’re watching him. He looks like he flew the plane. He only flew it as a passenger, but he’s flown —
[A PRO-BUSH PUNDIT]: He looks like a fighter pilot.
MATTHEWS: He looks for real. What is it about the commander in chief role, the hat that he does wear, that makes him — I mean, he seems like — he didn’t fight in a war, but he looks like he does.
But he wasn’t for real, and Matthews had his hopes crushed, and now it appears he’s about to make the same mistake.
Unfortunately, Fred Thompson is not the down-to-earth, Reaganesque figure he appears to be. In reality, he was a professional lobbyist for 18 years — twice as long as he served in the Senate.
Quote du Jour
Sense has ever been centered in the few …. Votes should be weighed, not counted. The State must sooner or later be wrecked where the majority rules and ignorance decides.
— Friedrich Von Schiller (1759-1805), German dramatist, historian
Florida to Determine ’08 Election — for the Republican Party
Deja-screw all over again: The GOP is going to party like it’s 2000 next year when Florida, through vote-count fraud and the machinations of then-state attorney general Katherine Harris, stole the election from Al Gore and gave it to George W. Bush. This time, however, the Democratic Party is playing the role of Harris in giving the election to the GOP.
‘Anybody who campaigns in Florida is ineligible for delegates.’
— Howard Dean
— Howard Dean
That’s the takeaway from Democratic National Committee chair Howard Dean’s comments to a bunch of worried rubes from New Hampshire the other day.
“Their primary essentially won’t count, ” Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean said of Florida. “Anybody who campaigns in Florida is ineligible for delegates.”
Why? Because Florida’s Republican legislature and its Republican governor decided to move the state’s presidential primary to Jan. 29 in clear violation of DNC rules that decreed that no primary was to be held before Feb. 5.
What’s at stake here are Florida’s 208 Democratic Party delegates and its 27 electoral votes. Florida is the nation’s fourth most populous state, which is why it can swing an election. Which is why the GOP engineered the primary move — to render the Democratic Party meaningless in Florida in the upcoming election.
Which is why the Republican candidates can ignore a major Hispanic political gathering, because they know they’ll have Florida and its large, politically active Hispanic populace to itself during the campaign.
So Howard Dean is taking his cue from George Bush and is sticking by his guns and refusing to waive the DNC’s rules, effectively punishing the Democratic Party because the Republicans screwed them over by moving the primary date. Yeeaaugh!
Good Thing for Angelina Jolie That Hypocrisy is Protected Speech
Angelina Jolie, who stars in the new film, “A Mighty Heart,” about murdered Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, is promoting the movie and its pro-press freedom message while tightly controlling her own interactions with the media. At a premiere event Wednesday to benefit Reporters Without Borders, Jolie insisted that journalists sign a contractual agreement before she would grant an interview, and, according to FoxNews, tried to have the right-wing mouthpiece banned from the event.
Reporters from most major media outlets balked Wednesday when they were presented with an agreement drawn up by Jolie’s Hollywood lawyer Robert Offer. The contract closely dictated the terms of all interviews.
Reporters were asked to agree to “not ask Ms. Jolie any questions regarding her personal relationships. In the event Interviewer does ask Ms. Jolie any questions regarding her personal relationships, Ms. Jolie will have the right to immediately terminate the interview and leave.”
The agreement also required that “the interview may only be used to promote the Picture. In no event may Interviewer or Media Outlet be entitled to run all or any portion of the interview in connection with any other story. … The interview will not be used in a manner that is disparaging, demeaning, or derogatory to Ms. Jolie.”
If that wasn’t enough, Jolie also requires that if any of these things happen, “the tape of the interview will not be released to Interviewer.” Such a violation, the signatory thus agrees, would “cause Jolie irreparable harm” and make it possible for her to sue the interviewer and seek a restraining order.
Not very press friendly, eh? Associated Press and USA Today reporters refused to sign the contract and canceled their interviews. When she saw the general reaction, Jolie canceled all print interviews. It was only through the intervention of Paramount staff that a FoxNews video crew was allowed to tape the actress on the red carpet.
Reporters without border indeed.
Military Seeking a Few Good Hackers
Wanted — cyber soldiers: The U.S Army and Air Force have put the word out on the street with the nation’s IT community that they are looking for some new software weapons with which to extend America’s sphere of influence in cyberspace. The guys who invented the Internet — the military-industrial complex — have asked the civilian computer industry to provide technologies they can use to wage offensive cyber attacks against enemy computer systems.
While Korea is training a generation of computer-game wizards, we’re futzing around with Howie Mandell on ‘Deal or No Deal.’
Apparently, the Army has already launched some “offensive information operations,” or OIOs, against enemy networks and communications platforms, but would not say who won or if the attacks were even successful. One does wonders because if they had won, would they be asking for help? Hmmmm.
[The Army] wants to “leverage innovative technologies” to improve its cyberattacks “and prevent enemy forces from detecting and countering efforts directed against them,” according to the announcement. “Technologies designed to interrupt these modern networks must use subtle, less obvious methodology that disguises the technique used, protecting the ability whenever possible to permit future use.”
The Air Force is more specific about its goals for upgrading its offensive cyber warfare capabilities:
The technologies would be used to “disrupt, deny, degrade or deceive an adversary’s information system,” according to the request for information. The Air Force wants technology that will help it map data and voice networks, provide it with access to those networks, conduct denial-of-service attacks on current and future network operating systems and network devices and engage in data manipulation on enemy networks.
The offensive cyberattack capabilities that the Army and Air Force want to develop match what Marine Gen. James Cartwright, commander of the Strategic Command, called for during a hearing of the House Armed Services Committee in March. He told the panel that if “we apply the principle of warfare to the cyber domain, as we do to sea, air and land, we realize the defense of the nation is better served by capabilities enabling us to take the fight to our adversaries, when necessary, to deter actions detrimental to our interests.”
While Bruce Schneir, a security consultant with BT Counterpane, endorsed the Army and Air Force efforts, he noted:
Since cyber space, unlike the physical battlefield, has connections to global networks that support commerce and communications, any offensive operations conducted by the United States must be fine-tuned to avoid disrupting computer systems that are not part of any enemy system that the military would target. That would be the cyber equivalent to collateral damage inflicted in a bombing campaign.
I’m surprised that in the six weeks that I have been hearing excuses from Bellsouth about why I can’t get DSL service at my house even though I had it there for the past five years they haven’t used the “cyber collateral damage” excuse. Maybe they are saving it for next week.
I’m not so sure I like the idea of our nation’s military becoming the mad hackers of the world. It’s one thing to fend off attacks, but quite another to unleash ballistic spam bombs on our enemies’ networks. But what I’m really worried about is whether the military really knows what enemy it’s up against. A couple weeks ago I saw a few minutes of a Korean game show where these fashionably dressed Korean teenage boys sit at computers and play a networked war game while the audience screams and waves signs and three distinguished-looking experts provide what I assume was play-by-play and color commentary.
As a nation, we aren’t anywhere near that league. While Korea is training a generation of computer-game wizards, we’re futzing around with Howie Mandell on “Deal or No Deal.”
Unless the military contracts it out to The Google, I just don’t have a good feeling about the OIOs of the impending cyber war.
Official to Limbaugh: We Don’t Have to Do Business with You
Newsflash for Rush Limbaugh: When somebody says they don’t have to contract with a station that carries your show, that’s not a First Amendment issue for you.
A Broward (Ft. Lauderdale) commissioner suggested the county not renew its contract for emergency broadcasts on a station that transmits the wisdom of the fat one, since a lot of people (like me for instance) avoid such stations for that very reason. But Rush and his supporters are crying big, Viagra-enriched tears, saying it just ain’t fair.
WIOD Program Manager Ken Charles agreed. ”It’s a shame people would let politics get in the way of saving lives during a hurricane,” he said.
Under the partnership, the station agrees to broadcast county press conferences in their entirety; the county lists the station on all its preparedness information.
At Tuesday’s meeting, Commissioner John Rodstrom brought up First Amendment concerns. ”When we start censoring what people write on radio, TV or newspapers, that is a slippery slope,” he said.
I’m not sure when the last time a county press conference saved any lives but I’ll allow as to how that could happen. One thing’s for sure though, just not doing business with somebody is not a slippery slope. Nobody’s telling Rush what to say or trying to keep him from saying it.
”We don’t have to do business with them,” [Commissioner Stacy] Ritter declared…
Ritter said Wednesday that commissioners should have made partnership deals with three stations.
”To limit it to one probably was not the way we should have gone, especially one that some people won’t listen to,” she said.
That makes too much sense, Stacy, and it looks like the rabid Rush-ites, whipped into a frenzy by their leader, have won this round. The county will likely renew the contract with just the one, Limbaugh-infused station.
But wait. I saved the best for last. What do you suppose Rush — in between whining about how mean the commission was to consider taking its business elsewhere — concluded about the matter live on the air?
“It’s just amazing to watch liberals in action. They can’t stand competition.”
UPDATE FRIDAY, JUNE 15
Broward County Commissioner, District 3, Stacy Ritter
From today’s Miami Herald:
Rush Limbaugh declared Broward County Commissioner Stacy Ritter ”a babe” on his radio show Thursday, eyeing her photo in the newspaper.
”Liberal babes are rare,” he said. “That’s why they stand out. It’s in The Miami Herald. It’s not Photoshopped.”
We can forgive Rush, however, it’s just the Viagra talkin’. — Buck
Quote du Jour
The history of intellectual growth and discovery clearly demonstrates the need for unfettered freedom, the right to think the unthinkable, discuss the unmentionable and challenge the unchallengeable. To curtail free expression strikes twice at intellectual freedom, for whosoever deprives another of the right to state unpopular views necessarily deprives others of the right to listen to those views.
— C. Vann Woodward (1908-1999), American historian
Poll: GOP Support Continues to Keep Bush Approval Artificially High at 29%
In the latest NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, Pres. George Bush has received his lowest marks on job approval ever by this polling entity: 29 percent.
In the analysis that accompanies the polling data, the low numbers are attributed to his crumbling support from Republicans:
Back in April, 75 percent of Republicans approved of Bush’s job performance, compared with 21 percent who disapproved. Now, only 62 percent of Republican approve, versus 32 percent who disapprove.
Despite mountains of evidence the George W. Bush is the most incompetent president this country has had yet, 62 percent of the members of his party continue to support him.
Bush doesn’t care what normal Americans think, and as long as he has the support of a majority of Republicans, his destructive agenda will continue, at home and abroad. The only glimmer of good news is that when he’s done, he may have hobbled his party perhaps beyond repair.
Are You on the Terror List? 509,000 People Are
The FBI watch list of suspected terrorists is so long, it would be easier to tell you who they’re not monitoring than who they are.
Privacy and civil liberties advocates say the list is growing uncontrollably, threatening its usefulness in the war on terror.
The bureau says the number of names on its terrorist watch list is classified.
You can check the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control list of suspected money launderers yourselfA portion of the FBI’s unclassified 2008 budget request posted to the Department of Justice Web site, however, refers to “the entire watch list of 509,000 names,” which is utilized by its Foreign Terrorist Tracking Task Force…
“It grows seemingly without control or limitation,” said ACLU senior legislative counsel Tim Sparapani of the terrorism watch list. Sparapani called the 509,000 figure “stunning.”
“If we have 509,000 names on that list, the watch list is virtually useless,” he told ABC News. “You’ll be capturing innocent individuals with no connection to crime or terror.”
“Useless” is probably accurate.
U.S. lawmakers and their spouses have been detained because their names were on the watch list.
Reporters who have reviewed versions of the list found it included the names of former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, at the time he was alive but in custody in Iraq; imprisoned al Qaeda plotter Zacarias Moussaoui; and 14 of the 19 Sept. 11, 2001 hijackers, all of whom perished in the attacks.
The same can be said for the OFAC list, which all financial institutions must check before opening a new account. That’s right, before you can open a checking account, some poor teller has to look to see if you’re there.
But unlike the FBI’s “secret” list, you can check the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control list of suspected money launderers yourself by simply going here.
After you get through the A’s, which all start with “Al-” something, the list gets more interesting. But like the FBI’s, it still contains this entry, under a couple of different spellings:
HUSSAIN, Saddam (a.k.a. ABU ALI; a.k.a. AL-TIKRITI, Saddam Hussein;
a.k.a. HUSAYN, Saddam; a.k.a. HUSSEIN, Saddam); DOB 28 Apr 1937;
POB al-Awja, near Tikrit, Iraq; nationality Iraq; named in UNSCR
1483; President since 1979 (individual) [IRAQ2]
Is it any wonder Americans don’t want to hand over their civil liberties in exchange for the “security” offered by our government?
