FAIR Finds Quantifiable Rightwing Bias on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal
Unbalanced: Here in the West Coast wing of Pensito Review’s electronic garret we start our day seven days a week by watching “Washington Journal” on C-SPAN. (Yes, it starts at 4M.) It is a great source of news about the goings-on in the Capitol, and one gets the sense that they try hard to prevent pros and cons for each side of every issue. But one also gets the sense that they tilt to the right.
Now Extra, a service of FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting), has done an analysis that quantifiably proves just that:
To test C-SPAN’s claims of fairness, Extra! studied Washington Journal’s guestlist, tabulating all 663 guests that appeared on the show in the six-month period from November 1, 2004 to April 30, 2005. Guests were classified by gender, ethnicity, party affiliation (if any) and occupation. The study also looked at the think tanks most prominently represented on the show.
Despite C-SPAN’s stated goals, Extra!’s study found Washington Journal skewing rightward, favoring Republican and right-of-center interview subjects by considerable margins over Democratic and left-of-center guests. The study also found that women, people of color and public interest viewpoints were substantially underrepresented.
Overall, people of European ancestry made up 85 percent of Washington Journal’s guestlist—563 out of 663. (Extra! was able to identify the ethnic background of more than 99 percent of guests.) People of African (26) and Asian (24) heritage accounted for 4 percent each, while those of Middle Eastern (22) and Latin American (18) descent represented 3 percent each. No Native Americans were identifiable on the guestlist from November 1, 2004 to April 30, 2005.


