Rick Warren’s Church Scrubs Gay Ban from Website


SCRUBBED: “Someone unwilling to repent of their homosexual lifestyle would not be accepted at a member as Saddleback Church”
Yesterday, BeliefNet reported that the website for Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church in Orange County, Cal., contained a warning that unrepentant gays were forbidden from joining the church:

Because membership in a church is an outgrowth of accepting the Lordship and leadership of Jesus in one’s life, someone unwilling to repent of their homosexual lifestyle would not be accepted as a member at Saddleback Church.

Today, that section, which was part of a longer diatribe about the sin of homosexuality (see below), is gone. According to BeliefNet, this link led to the page banning gays. Now it connects to a page titled “What We Believe.” BeliefNet is known for down-the-line reporting on religion. It was recently purchased by Rupert Murdoch’s Newscorp.

Via Good As You, there are are still offensive statements about gays on the megachurch site:

[…]

Beyond the Surface of Obama’s Choice of Rick Warren

In one of his earliest and most successful attempts to piss off the world and connect Iraq to the 9/11 attacks, Pres. George W. Bush labeled Iraq, Iran and North Korea the “axis of evil,” and imposed sanctions intended to isolate them. Subsequent Bush-Cheney-Rice “diplomacy” has consisted of further punishing states with which they disagree by refusing to talk to them.

It’s classic Obama to include those with whom he disagrees

To say this policy has been an utter failure for the United States, leaving us with fewer friends in an increasingly polarized world, would be an understatement. Rather than crippling our alleged enemies, Iran and North Korea have only grown more defiant and closer to nuclear armament. And we all know the destruction and loss of life that resulted when Bush decided to halt the now proven United Nations weapons inspection program and invade Iraq instead.

Barack Obama examined the Bush cold shoulder policy and rejected it. He was derided by both Republicans and some Democrats — notably Hillary Clinton — for saying during the debates that he would be willing to talk to our opponents, including leaders of Iran. But history has shown that Obama’s path of holding friends close and enemies closer is wise.

Which brings us to Obama’s invitation to Pastor Rick Warren to provide his inaugural invocation. Gays are appalled that Warren, a man who unapologetically opposes gay marriage, was chosen. Why, they ask, would someone who helped pass anti gay marriage legislation be honored with a spot on this day of triumph for progressives?

[…]

If Obama Screws Up, Blame It on the Yankees

As Politico astutely points out, Barack Obama has not named a single Southerner to his cabinet, and half the slots are already gone. Some politicians below the Mason-Dixon line have noticed the snub and are not happy about it:

“Not a one,” grumbles a one senior Democratic aide who hails from the South. “Not even half of one, unless you count Hillary Clinton, and she doesn’t count because she’s not even an Arkansan anymore. She’s a Yankee.”

Noting that Obama picked up 55 Electoral College votes in North Carolina, Virginia and Florida, the conservative-leaning Web site speculates why he has not chosen a denizen of the South:

Some Democrats chock (sic) it up to happenstance and say Obama is simply picking the most qualified people, no matter the region. Others acknowledge, however, that the paucity of Democrats in Obama’s cabinet reflects the declining political power of the red-leaning Southern states and the weakening bench of the blue team there.

“Who comes to mind immediately?” asked Charles Bullock, a political science professor at the University of Georgia. “No one, really.”

“The leading politicians in the South at least for the last generation have been active as Republicans,” Bullock added. “You just don’t have Democrats that come to mind as the go-to person or the expert. It highlights the thinness of the Democratic bench in the South… The skill set is so depleted.”

If Obama doesn’t appoint a Southerner to top level policy positions, it looks like he is buying into the stereotype that there isn’t anyone from the South smart enough to work for him

Ouch! Bullock does have a point. And he is a professor, so he must be right.

Alas, the Democratic Party in the South is much like a Southern family saga to be found in the works of William Faulkner — the strong, populist patriarchs of yore have degenerated into the ineffectual bumpkins running the party today.

Just look at the southerners rumored as prospective cabinet members:

Had he not self-destructed in a sex scandal, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards might have landed a Cabinet post. The names of former Georgia Sens. Sam Nunn and Max Cleland briefly bounced around the Obama orbit.

Inez Tenenbaum of South Carolina is in the running for secretary of education. Former Texas Rep. Charlie Stenholm has been mentioned as possible pick for Agriculture secretary.

But Obama hasn’t pulled the trigger yet, prompting one former senior Democratic Hill aide to complain of a “geographic snubbing.”

“Southerners are pretty sensitive to the stereotype that they are slow in mind as well as voice,” the former aide said. “The risk to the president-elect is that if he doesn’t appoint anyone from the South to top level policy positions, he is going to look like he is buying into the stereotype that there isn’t anyone from the South smart enough to work for him.

But no matter who he chooses, Obama is screwed. Hispanics were pissed when he passed over Bill Richardson for secretary of state: “We’re definitely a little sore about it,” one Hispanic Democrat said. “I’ve heard lots of grumbling in the Hispanic community.”

And gays and lesbians expect a non-closeted cabinet member: “We’ve paid our dues in terms of money and effort. It is time for the people of our community to serve at the highest levels of government. This is something our community expects,” said Denis Dison, vice president of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund and Leadership Institute.

At the rate Obama is going, however, one thing is certain — if he screws up, we can always blame the Yankees.

Who’s Footing the Inauguration Bill?

According to Barack Obama’s official inauguration site (who knew?), a whole bunch of regular folks have given a whole lotta moolah to help him usher in his administration. Obama doesn’t have a PAC, he has a PIC, which is described on the page:

In keeping with President-elect Obama’s commitment to changing the way business is done in Washington, the Presidential Inaugural Committee (PIC) is taking unprecedented steps to insure transparency in the public reporting of donors to a Presidential Inaugural Committee. This chart will allow you to view, sort, and search virtually real-time information on all donors contributing over $200 to the 2009 Presidential Inaugural Committee.

Unlike previous inaugural committees, the 2009 PIC does not accept contributions from corporations, political action committees, labor unions, current federally-registered lobbyists, non-U.S. citizens and registered foreign agents and does not accept individual contributions in excess of $50,000.

The list has some well-known names or names that seem like they belong to well-known people: Halle Berry from Bumper Inc. gave $50k, the max. Several people from the Powers, Rogers and Smith firm in Chicago gave $25k, for a total of $100. Glass sculptor Dale Chihuly gave $50k. Jamie Curtis of Santa Monica gave $25k. Berry Gordy of L.A. gave 50. Christopher Guest gave 25. Samuel Jackson of SZT Promotions in L.A. gave 50. Wendy Rockefeller of the Rockefeller Family Foundation gave $12k, while Laurance Rockefeller of the League of Conservation Voters gave $38k, for a total of 50. Five members of the Soros family each donated $50k. Sharon Stone of L.A., who lists herself as self-employed, gave $50k. Robert Zemekis of Burbank, also self-employed, gave 50.

Gee, I guess all that stuff they said about Obama and celebrities was true after all.

The site has a schedule of events, a blog and my favorite part — Inaugural Store: Coming Soon!

All That Republicans Want for Christmas is a Good, Old-Fashioned Obamagate

Ed Kilgore, in his column at the Democratic Strategist, wonders why the mainstream media is trying so hard to link the pay-to-serve scandal for the Illinois senate seat to Barack Obama.

After all, every single indicator points to the lack of involvement by not only Obama, but all those who sought to replace him. That no one would attempt to buy the seat is what left Gov. Rod Blagojevich a-sputter in four-letter words. But does that keep such media outlets as Time magazine from running stories titled, Can Obama Escape the Taint of Blagojevich? Nah.

The basic media dynamic is to find some Republican to say it’s a problem for Obama, and thus they have a “story” manufactured out of thin air and partisan malice

…as BarbinMD shows at DailyKos today, none of this has kept political reporters from darkly suggesting that the Blago scandal is casting some sort of giant shadow on the Obama presidency. As she explains, the basic media dynamic is that reporters find some Republican to say it’s a problem for Obama, and thus they have a “story” manufactured out of thin air and partisan malice.

Maybe all this represents sheer journalistic laziness, or the cynical calculation of reporters who know they can get serious ink by linking two big stories–the juicy Blago scandal, and the Obama transition. Or maybe it’s a sign that some folk in the MSM, still smarting from endless claims that they are “in the tank” for Obama, want to prove otherwise by coming up with an “Obamagate” before the man has even taken office.

But at some point, it really needs to stop, or get derisively hooted off the front page and the evening news.

Yeah, good luck with that.

VRC Fringe: Obama Is the ‘Most Notorious Criminal in the History of the Planet’

They’re Baaack….

The fringe of the newly revitalized Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy (VRC) achieved remarkable success in its first attack on Barack Obama yesterday. With the help of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, a VRC member in good standing, the fringers forced the nation’s highest court to waste 15 minutes of its valuable time deciding whether to hear evidence that Obama is not a bona fide citizen of the United States. As Buck noted soon afterward, the court refused to hear the case.
“This is the largest hoax perpetrated against the United States in 200 years.”
— Philip Berg, Obama conspiracy theorist

But as we learned during the Clinton era, the VRC always gets the last word — and nothing they say is true can ever be proved false. True to form, the fringers held a news conference in D.C. yesterday to let the world know that their fight against Obama ain’t over, not hardly — and WaPo’s Dana Milbank was there:

“This is the largest hoax perpetrated against the United States in 200 years,” Philip Berg declared in a news conference at the National Press Club. His colleagues delivered the further news that “Barack Obama is the most notorious criminal in the history of this planet” and that the president-elect’s claim to be a natural-born American has “the potential to propel our nation into a time of great peril,” a time of “widespread chaos, disturbances to public tranquillity.”

Berg, a Pennsylvania lawyer and the author of another lawsuit alleging that Obama is not native-born, and therefore is not eligible to be president, sought to establish several facts. One: “He knows he was adopted in Indonesia.” Two: “He was born in Kenya.” Three: “His real name would be Barry Soetoro.” Four: “If he didn’t go through immigration, believe it or not Barack Obama would be an illegal alien today.” And five: “If and when the right court handles this matter, Barack Obama” and everybody around him “should really be tried criminally and many of them should go to jail.”

Obama’s birth certificate has been verified by Hawaiian authorities and non-partisan fact-checkers — all of which was a complete waste of time as far as the VRCers are concerned. “That document is a forgery, it’s a fraud, just like Barack Obama is,” Berg told reporters yesterday, according to Milbank. “His birth certificate will indicate he was born in Kenya.”

[…]

Supremes: Obama is Hawaiian and, by Extension, American

citizenship.jpg

Despite the best efforts of chronic self-loathers Justice Clarence Thomas and perpetual sore loser Alan Keyes, the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear an emergency appeal of a suit brought by some crank named Leo Donofrio claiming that president-elect Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen.

Donofrio claimed that because Obama’s Kenyan father had British citizenship, Barack Obama Jr. was British, not American, although his mother was both a U.S. citizen and was physically in Hawaii — by most accounts a U.S. state at the time — when she birthed him, or as they said in the movie “Mandingo,” she “slipped a suckah.”

Apparently, no one but Donofrio was surprised at the ruling:

“This is the least surprising move by the Supreme Court in years,” said CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen. “No serious legal scholar believed that the Justices would take the case and overturn the election.”

Another crackpot, Phillip J. Berg, contends that Obama is actually a citizen of Kenya and Indonesia, apparently believing that if one spends any length of time in a country, one automatically becomes a citizen thereof. Berg’s suit looks like it is going the way of Donofrio’s and several other nuisance suits challenging Obama’s citizenship status.

But, invoking the “one-drop rule,” almost everyone agrees that Obama is a black man, even though he spent nine months in a white woman’s womb.

Poll: Insiders Grade Obama Cabinet Picks

grades.jpg
In its weekly PollTrack survey of Washington insiders, National Journal revealed some interesting opinions in both political parties:

Q: How would you grade each of the following Obama Cabinet nominations?

Democrats (72 votes)
Hillary Rodham Clinton (secretary of State) A-
Robert Gates (Defense secretary) B+
Timothy Geithner (Treasury secretary) B+
Eric Holder (attorney general) B+

Hillary Rodham Clinton
A. “Her detractors will be pleasantly surprised at how well she works in his and our behalf: A shrewd, global-view appointment.”
A. “Better to have your chief rival on your team, supporting your policies.”
B. “She’ll do a fine job, but it could act as a distraction, and I’m not convinced that Clinton will do a better job than some others, such as [Bill] Richardson.”

Robert Gates
A. “He is seen as a nonpartisan figure, and is a mature figure with a philosophy consistent with Obama’s plans for the next few years.”
B. “As long as he executes the wishes of the commander-in-chief.”
D. “If you want a Republican, name a Republican, just not this one. This guy is part of the team that America so overwhelmingly rejected on November 4.”

Timothy Geithner
A. “Broad bipartisan support, very bright, but with real-world experience — comes from the Bob Rubin school of economics, which is a plus.”
B. “Time will tell whether the Geithner-Paulson approach has been the correct one, but the economic crisis needed someone that insiders respect and support, and the Geithner pick has sent the right signals to the Hill, Wall Street, and the boardrooms.”
C. “Why pick a guy who was knee-deep in the banker bailout debacle?”

Eric Holder
A. “Knows the territory and won’t need on-the-job training.”
B. “Solid, honest, and knows how Washington works; an AG who will honor the Constitution.”
C. “Is this really the best we have out there? The pardon may have been overblown, but is this really change? ‘Yes, we can,’ but ‘No, we didn’t’ on some of these early picks.”

Q: How would you grade each of the following Obama Cabinet nominations?

Republicans (78 votes)
Hillary Rodham Clinton (secretary of State) B
Robert Gates (Defense secretary) A-
Timothy Geithner (Treasury secretary) B+
Eric Holder (attorney general) C+

[…]