Thanks to the Philadelphia Inquirer, now you can, kind of. Seems the Inquirer has hatched a brilliant solution to the problem of falling ad revenues and subscriptions — allow sports gambling on your online newspaper site, according to Editor & Publisher. E&P itself could have used a couple of windfall jackpots last year when it was forced to stop publishing until it was partially saved by more traditional means.
But wait, you say, Isn’t online gambling illegal in the United States? Yes, gentle reader, you are correct — except for one small area that was carved out of the 2006 Unlawful Internet Gaming Enforcement Act. Indeed it seems to have been presciently carved out for the sole purpose of saving Philadelphia’s newspaper four years after it was enacted.
Seems you can gamble on line if you are betting on a fantasy sports team. The Inquirer has partnered with FanDuel, which is based in Britain where betting on sports through your favorite fish wrapper is legal.
Usually fantasy sports team managers choose a team and play it for the season. In the Inquirer’s scheme, managers go to the site, pay $5, put together a team of, depending on the season, professional basketball, baseball or football players for one day, and depending on how their team performs, can win up to $90.
In a press release, FanDuel claims that some players make as much as $16,000 per month. The company also claims that British newspapers are raking in the dough on daily fantasy gaming.
So is gambling the answer to what plagues the newspaper business? Probably not, but desperate times require desperate measures. And let’s just skip the morality part. Here in Florida the lottery ostensibly goes to support our education system — ahem!
So who cares if a newspaper gets into the gambling business. After all, living on a daily newsroom deadline is pretty much a 50:50 proposition these days, anyway.
Now, the president, with all the vast nuclear experience that he acquired as a community organizer, as a part-time senator and as a full-time candidate, all that experience, still no accomplishment to date with North Korea and Iran.
— Sarah Palin, practicing her special brand of snark in a speech at the Southern Republican Leadership Council.
OK, I ditched them, I confess.
I didn’t think it’d make such a mess.
Hey, I’m watching my daughter
Competing at soccer,
And for that, I don’t need the press.
While Mitt Romney skipped the Southern Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans last week, Ron Paul attended and gave a speech that was enthusiastically received. In the SRLC straw poll — said to be the first vote in the GOP presidential beauty pageant — Romney and Paul tied with 24 percent of the vote. Romney won on a technical, however. He beat Paul by one vote, 439 to 438.
(If the primary election for president were held today, for whom would you vote?)
Newt Gingrich 18% (321)
Mike Huckabee 4% (80)
Gary Johnson 1% (3)
Sarah Palin 18% (330)
* Ron Paul 24% (438)
Tim Pawlenty 3% (54)
Mike Pence 3% (58)
* Mitt Romney 24% (439)
Rick Santorum 2% (41)
Second Choice
(Who would be your second choice in the Republican Primary Election for president?)
* Newt Gingrich 20% (339)
Mike Huckabee 11% (178)
Gary Johnson 6% (104)
* Sarah Palin 20% (332)
Ron Paul 6% (98)
Tim Pawlenty 7% (114)
Mike Pence 8% (141)
Mitt Romney 14% (242)
Rick Santorum 7% (125)
In case you wondered — Gary Johnson is the former governor of North Dakota. At 57, he’s a youngster in this crowd.
But doesn’t the inclusion of a second choice on the ballot sound like something rigged to ensure that Sarah Palin would win something? What other reason could there be — except to provide a runner-up (who is not Ron Paul) who can take over if the winner is unable to fulfill the duties of the straw poll winner, for whatever reason.
It’s also interesting that she tied for runner-up with Newt Gingrich, who is the master of the game of being completely unelectable as president — never ever gonna happen — and yet maintaining status as a possible candidate in order to score lucrative book deals and speaking gigs and face time on Fox News.
But it’s apt that this beauty pageant has runners-up, even if it’s a pageant where the contestants, except for Palin, a former runner up in a real beauty pageant, are all not particularly attractive middle-aged men — a fact that may explain why one of the SRLC’s sponsors was Pfizer, makers of Viagra.
Morris, left, and PalfreySimilar to shocking — and still unresolved — rumors last fall that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990, now a question has arisen about whether Fox News pundit Dick Morris has any knowledge about the death of Deborah Jean Palfrey, the DC Madam.
We are not saying that Morris was involved in Palfrey’s death. That would be snarky and disingenuous. But on April 29, 2007, during proceedings in court, Palfrey’s attorney accused Morris of hiring prostitutes from Palfrey:
Dick Morris, the television commentator and former adviser to President Bill Clinton, who resigned in 1996 after reports that he was seeing a prostitute, was also a customer, Ms. Palfrey’s lawyer has said in court. Mr. Morris has denied the accusation.
Palfrey’s attorney, Montgomery Sibley, also announced that he planned to depose Morris in order to get him on the record about his dealings with Pamela Martin & Associates, Palfrey’s escort service in the capitol.
On May 1, 2008 — just a few days shy of exactly one year after the threat of a lawsuit against Morris was made — Palfrey was found dead in a storage shed behind her mother’s mobile home in Tarpon Springs, Fla. She had been hanged. Investigators found what were apparently suicide notes, and the coroner determined the death to be self-inflicted.
But because Palfrey had many powerful enemies, presumably including Dick Morris, there has been speculation that foul play, not suicide, caused Palfrey’s death, as noted in the New York Times:
All over the Internet, from reader comments on The Lede to the far misty corners of conspiracy-theory land, hardly anyone seems inclined to accept the initial police judgment that Ms. Palfrey simply committed suicide. A quick search turns up scores of variations on the same theme: She knew too much about too many powerful men, so it must have been murder. (More about all that in a minute.)…
Dan Moldea, who tried to develop a book proposal for a Palfrey biography, is quoted by Time magazine saying that Ms. Palfrey told him she would sooner kill herself than go to prison again (she served a sentence for prostitution in California in the 1990’s).
That claim is being called a part of a cover-up by many of those disinclined to believe that Ms. Palfrey’s death was suicide, because she had often said the opposite — that she was not the kind to kill herself, unlike one of her former employees, Brandy Britton, a onetime university instructor who took her own life in February 2007 while awaiting trial on prostitution charges…
Back to the dead-women-tell-no-tales story line: It seems to be widely taken for granted that Ms. Palfrey had more, bigger, juicier names to name than the handful of prominent customers who have surfaced…
Morris, who is unquestionably big and might well be juicy, has made a tidy career out of bashing the Clintons on Fox and in books that reviewers have routinely found to be antifactual. Morris’ antipathy toward the Clintons is fueled by gigantic fit of pique that started when they fired him as their longtime political adviser just hours before the 1996 Democratic Convention, after the aforementioned prostitute revealed in a tabloid that Morris had a fetish for sucking toes.
In his aptly titled 2004 memoir, “Rewriting History,” Morris alluded to the allegation that Hillary Clinton was responsible for the murder of her associate Vince Foster. Here’s an excerpt from a review:
Morris implies that [Hillary] Clinton is capable of murdering anyone who crosses her, saying once (p. 229) that none of her close friends discusses Clinton’s private life “and still lives” and (p. 230) that if someone did speak of it without authorization “she’d be floating, figuratively, face down in the Hudson River.” For conservative cognoscenti, this is a reference to the ridiculous and totally unfounded assertion that Clinton murdered former White House counsel Vince Foster and then dumped his body in a Washington, D.C., park.
Morris apparently remains suspicious about the circumstances of Foster’s death in 1993, despite the fact it has been the subject of three federal investigations — one by the United States Park Police and two by Republican independent prosecutors, first Robert Fiske and then Clinton nemesis Ken Starr. In each case, Foster’s death was found to be a suicide.
Similarly, people with suspicions about Palfrey’s death might suggest that Morris’ allusion to the fantasy that Hillary killed Foster to silence him could be interpreted as a projection of Morris’ own deep-seated desire to silence his critics with murder.
That said, the circumstantial evidence here — that Morris was a frequenter of prostitutes, that he wrote about silencing adversaries by murdering them, that he was threatened with a lawsuit by Palfrey’s lawyer that could have killed his lucrative career on Fox News — is stronger than it is with other questions hanging out there, including the rumor that Glenn Beck murdered and raped a nine-year-old girl in 1990, the Vietnam War era stories floated by right wingers that Sen. John McCain collaborated with the North Vietnamese when he was a POW, and the equally persistent allegations among some on the right that Pres. Obama was born in Kenya or Indonesia and that he is a socialist fascist Muslim.
Again, we’re not saying Dick Morris hired someone to kill Deborah Jean Palfrey, we’re simply saying questions are out there. Let’s hope Morris doesn’t make the same mistake Glenn Beck has made in refusing to address his alleged incident in 1990. If Morris hides behind a wall of silence on this issue, he could find that, like the rumors about Beck’s alleged involvement in rape, murder and pedophilia, the question could linger for years to come: What does Dick Morris know about the death of the DC Madam.
Finally, there’s this. Tarpon Springs, where Palfrey died, is the sponge capitol of Florida. Sponges are often used to clean toes — Dick Morris has a toe fetish.
Elon throttled Starlink because Ukranians were killing Russians,
But by throttling it, Elon enabled Russians to kill Ukranians.
So the world’s richest, weirdest guy,
Gets to decide who lives and who dies?
That’s too much power in the hands of a dude who wants to be a Martian.
“Stephen Miller is a stone-cold racist. His track record speaks for itself, and I’ve got zero interest in working with that kind of individual.”
— “House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller a ‘stone-cold racist’ and said he can’t work with him,” Punchbowl News reports.
“Take, for example, the French Revolution. Remember when Marie Antoinette said, ‘Let them eat cake’? Now, is that a problem of accountability and tyranny, a corrupt government? Or is it a problem of affordability and standard of living? It’s both! Authoritarianism and tyranny are extremely expensive for the people. And it’s the exact same thing when you go down the line with Donald Trump. So, are we going to go after the corruption? Yeah, you’re damn right. And are we going to go after affordability and making people’s lives easier? Yeah, you’re damn right. We’re going to do both of them.”
“Here’s the problem with the red meat: It becomes an addiction. Once you go there and you put that out there, then you’re forced to defend it. So what do they do? They double down. They triple down again.”
— Sen.-elect Abdul El-Sayed (D), quoted by the Washington Post, on Republicans relying on anti-Muslim attacks in the Michigan U.S. Senate race.
<2>U.S. inflation was higher than expected last month as the rising prices that powered sweeping Democratic victories in last week’s midterm elections appear likely to pose ongoing challenges for the White House and the Federal Reserve, the Associated Press reported. The consumer price index rose 0.4% from September to October, the Labor Department said Tuesday, down from 0.6% the previous month. The government did not report a yearly inflation rate because last year’s government shutdown meant no data was released for October 2025. But excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core prices rose 0.3%, the same as the preceding month. Both figures were a tenth of a point higher than forecast, and at an annual rate would be well above the Fed’s 2% target.
President Donald Trump’s approval rating held near the lowest level of his political career, depressed by national concerns over rising prices that tanked his Republican Party in last week’s midterm elections, according to ?a Reuters/Ipsos poll completed on Monday. Some 32% of Americans approve of Trump’s performance ?in the White House, unchanged from two prior Reuters/Ipsos polls conducted between late ?October and early November. It was one percentage point higher than his 31% rating ?in a Reuters/Ipsos poll in mid-October, the lowest of his career in politics, reported Reuters.
A record number of women are running for state legislative seats this November, more than two-thirds of whom are Democrats, reports Florida Phoenix. Across the 46 states with legislative seats on the ballot, a total of 3,824 women are running — up from 2022’s previous record of 3,621 women candidates, according to the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University. Women make up 35.5% of all state legislative candidates this cycle. Currently, women hold about one-third of state legislative seats across the country — a record level of representation but nowhere near parity.
“Prediction markets about the 2026 midterm elections have surpassed $1.4 billion in trading volume as Election Day fast approaches,” CNN reports. “This year has seen massive growth in the prediction industry, where people can bet on real-world events like sports, entertainment and the weather. While small-scale election markets have been around for a while, they gained traction before the 2024 presidential election and have seen huge numbers for the 2026 midterms.”
G. Elliot Morris: “Low-knowledge 2024 voters say they backed Trump by 8 points, according to our poll. Today they give him a net job approval of ?27, a 35-point shift. Compare that to Trump’s approval rating among voters who got both questions right: These voters backed Harris by 1 point and now give Trump a net ?24 approval, a 23-point shift. … Low-information voters have moved against Trump at a higher rate than high-information voters, by 12 points.”