Swiftboat Alert: Right-Wing Theme is Obama’s Alleged Drug Use

Dear Dr. Democrat:

I keep hearing references in the conservative media about Barack Obama’s alleged use of drugs, but I read his book, “Dreams of My Father,” and though it seemed his friends were getting caught up in drugs, he went another way, though he did admit to drinking beer and smoking cigarettes. What’s the truth? Is Obama just another black drug addict?

Scared Straight
doctordemocratsmall1.jpg
Dear Scared:

Smells like swiftboating to me. I watch C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal” every morning to get a sense of what’s burbling on right-wing radio without having to sully my ears by listening to it.

If the right-wing callers to C-SPAN this morning are a gauge, the new meme is Obama’s drug use. One caller read a passage from one of Obama’s books (supposedly) it which Obama said he was going to try heroin, but the hand of the junkie who was going to hit him up was shaking so bad he didn’t do it. Another caller asked if we shouldn’t be concerned that Obama was still addicted to coke. A few calls later, someone seconded the question about addiction. Another caller said she’d heard from a missionary in Africa that Obama was sending U.S. campaign donations to his cousin’s “tribe” in Kenya.

One indicator that it is a concerted effort (that this is a new theme being pounded by Rush Limbaugh, Neil Boortz and/or Sean Hannity) is that these callers were off topic. The topic was free speech, ironically, but in the “rules” of the show, you’re supposed to stick to the topic or the host will hang up on you, unless it’s an “open phones” segment, which is usually in the last half-hour.

A Democratic caller finally came on and presented a lot of what is known about Bush’s coke problem toward the end of the half-hour.

I haven’t read Obama’s books but two colleagues in my practice have, and neither of them remember a reference to heroin.

Just as John Kerry really did lead operations under fire and saved the life of one of his men, Al Gore never said he invented the Internet and the Clintons lost $100,000 on Whitewater at a time when Bill’s annual salary as governor was $35,000, reality is irrelevant to the racists, feeble-minded rednecks and Christian nationalists for whom the lies about Obama’s drug use and cousins in Kenya are directed.

There’s very little we can do about that. The damage is done at the margins, and only works in a tight race.

McCain is teetering on becoming Bob Dole Jr. But until we see signs that a landslide similar to ’96 — Clinton 49/Dole 41 — is in the offing, we have to assume the GOP will take all the red states Bush took in 2004. (My oft-stated theory is, where there are large concentrations of Republicans, you’ll find large concentrations of racists.)

People who identify as Dems or Gops are probably paying close attention already. It’s them darned Independents who tend to wait and focus at the end. If these lies are allowed to take hold, they become “facts” that can turn public opinion in the fall.

Kerry’s biggest mistake was saying he voted for the war before he voted against it. His second mistake was not slamming back on the Swiftboat ads.

If I were Obama, I’d assemble a rapid response team to take these things down in a very timely fashion. He’d need someone with incredibly high credibility to do it.

One name comes to mind: Oprah.

Dr. D.

Ask Dr. Democrat: Who Decides What Happens with the Michigan and Florida Delegates?

Dear Dr. Democrat:

I’m confused by all the talk about the Florida and Michigan delegations to the Democratic Convention. Who decides whether the delegates get seated at the convention and how many of them go? Is it Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean?

Disturbed Over Delegates

Dear Disturbed:

I have to reiterate that it won’t be up to Dr. X (ed. note: Dr. Democrat’s playful nickname for Dr. Howard Dean) who gets seated at the convention. It will be up to Barack Obama, and as soon as Obama has enough delegates to win without Florida and Michigan, which I believe will happen after West Virginia and Kentucky, he will seat the delegations as they are configured now.
doctordemocrat.jpg
This whole thing has been a charade from the get-go, and Dr. X’s threat not to seat the delegations has been 100 percent horse hockey. Iowa and New Hampshire have extraordinary sway over the pols in both parties, and Dr. X had to do their bidding, but it was never up to him who would be seated at the convention, not for a second.

Obama will have to smooth the waters among the pols in Iowa and New Hampshire, but if they are at their least pliable a year before the primary/caucus, they are at their most pliable two months before the convention. This will cease to be a controversy in this cycle, but GOP pols have been watching and have learned how to make mischief.

The only chance Dr. X might have had to decide anything about who gets seated would have been if the contest hadn’t been settled before the convention. But even then, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (currently the most senior elected Democrat) chairs the convention rules committee and outranks him. In the unlikely event that the race is still undecided in late August, Clinton and Obama will negotiate, and if they can’t reach a compromise, it will go to the rules committee.

Dr. X’s job from the moment Clinton drops out of the race and leaves the field to Obama is to be the nominee’s number-one cheerleader and to make sure the convention’s trains run on time and to the liking of the nominee (who speaks when, etc.). Despite having been elected DNC chair, Dr. X now serves at the pleasure of Obama. It is not done for the nominee to replace the DNC chair before the general election but, come January, if Obama wins and he wants a new chair, he’ll have one. In the meantime, if he is unhappy with Dr. X, he’ll put someone in as assistant chair or special counsel or some such, who will really run things while Doc X twiddles his thumbs.

Conversely, quite often party chairs who do a good job are rewarded with the post of secretary of commerce in the new administration.

Dr. D

Ask Dr. Democrat: Will Florida and Michigan Be Seated at the Convention?

Dear Dr. Democrat:

I’m not sure I want Florida’s delegation to get seated. How would you do it? And how would you seat Michigan? Would you really think it’s fair to have those delegates count when Clinton’s was the only name on the ballot? I am really stymied here.

Really Stymied

Dear R.S.:

In terms of the actual proceedings of the convention, the “who gets seated” issue goes away when Obama reaches the magic number on May 20. There will not be a floor fight, which makes it irrelevant (or at least trivial) how many delegates Clinton got. The nomination will be settled with the first roll call.
doctordemocrat.jpg
The convention will be even more harmonious if Clinton is the VP nominee, which looks more likely today than it has, but is by no means certain. Etiquette requires Obama to offer it to her first, a la John Kennedy offering his VP spot to Lyndon Johnson, his bitterest rival. Like LBJ in 1960, HRC might just take the 2008 nominee up on his offer.

The new dynamic about seating delegates after Obama becomes the nominee is that the ultimate decision about how to keep Iowa, New Hampshire, Florida and Michigan happy no longer rests with Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean, but with Obama. I’m predicting he will seat Florida and Michigan, and then seek some permanent solution to the “me first” early primary controversy — a rotating list of states that can vote in January with Iowa and New Hampshire over the next century or so, a single permanent Super Tuesday for all states or rotating regional Super Tuesdays (the West votes first in 2012, the South in 2016, etc.), etc.

This year will the last we’ll have super delegates, that’s for sure.

Dr. D