Republicans Introduced Reagan’s Amnesty Act for 3 Million ‘Illegals’ Six Months Before 1986 Midterm Elections

When their hissy fits subside over Pres. Obama’s announcement last week that he is instructing immigration police to exempt about 800,000 children of undocumented workers from deportation, it would be instructive to remind GOPT spittle-spewers that their patron saint, Ronald Reagan, signed a law in 1986 that provided amnesty to 3 million “illegals”:

[In] 1986, Ronald Reagan signed a sweeping immigration reform bill into law. It was sold as a crackdown: There would be tighter security at the Mexican border, and employers would face strict penalties for hiring undocumented workers.

But the bill also made any immigrant who’d entered the country before 1982 eligible for amnesty … The law granted amnesty to nearly 3 million illegal immigrants, yet was largely considered unsuccessful because the strict sanctions on employers were stripped out of the bill for passage.

Republicans who sat on their hands — the ones, that is, who were not applauding — when George W. Bush signed more than 270 executive orders, including one that authorized the wiretapping without court order of American citizens, were upset that Pres. Obama exercised his right to change the immigrants’ disposition by executive order. John Yoo, the author of Bush’s infamous “torture memo” — essentially an executive order authorizing the government to torture terror suspects — had the temerity to say, “President Obama’s claim that he can refuse to deport 800,000 aliens here in the country illegally illustrates the unprecedented stretching of the Constitution and the rule of law.”

Republicans were also upset that Obama’s action was “political,” given that it was done five months before the presidential election. Reagan’s amnesty law was introduced by his party’s majority in the U.S. Senate in May 1986, six months before the congressional elections. Republicans pushed the law through with the hope that the promise of amnesty would help them win Latino voters and keep control of the Senate in the fall.

Their hopes were dashed, however. On Election Day that Nov. 4, the Senate flipped from 47 Democrats and 53 Republicans to 55 Democrats and 45 Republicans. Two days later, Reagan signed the amnesty law into effect.

Connect:

12 thoughts on “Republicans Introduced Reagan’s Amnesty Act for 3 Million ‘Illegals’ Six Months Before 1986 Midterm Elections”

  1. Yeah Reagan sucked, he was a complete douchebag for his spending habits and sellout to illegal immigrants that break the law of the US.

  2. Can not find the emergency medical act Reagan brought into existence to protect the illegal immigrants harvesting our food. Sure this was part of this package I wanted to share with my nightie friends who believe this guy could be dug up and still be relevant with teabags, wanted to see the shock register. Of course he did this to help flood the labor market to hurt the workers standard of living and ruining the unions. As an x-American Democratic Union member the cross over to the dark side was 180%, from love of union member’s and country, to attacking the US and unions and any worker getting a decent living wage. The descent to the bottom for workers started with this guy. But has someone tampered with this act or was it all by itself? It was called something like an Emergency Medical Act. might not have the word illegal Immigrant. Would like anyone with specifics to drop me a note. Joe6pK

  3. Lemme know when you stop frothing long enough to define the difference between a bill capable of passing congress and an EO designed to buy votes that wouldn’t have passed this one.

  4. Thank you, Recon! Finally a reasoned, not to mention true, presentation of the facts. The rest of these morons are Obama drones.

  5. Foxbot Dittohead fuckwits, do your research. Reagan had a rubberstamp GOP Senate led by Bob Dole and a Democratic House led by Speaker Tip O’Neill. Obama has a neo-Confederate tea bagger Congress that is the most obstructionist in history.

  6. There is a HUGE difference between signing a law passed LEGALLY BY CONGRESS and a president acting unilaterally and ILLEGALLY! Get you heads out of your Arse!

  7. Do you Grubers even understand the difference between signing legislation passed by Congress and flaunting the law?

  8. Reagan signed an executive order deferring deportation of undocumented children in 1987. George H.W. Bush signed an executive order deferring deportation of undocumented spouses and children in 1990. Presidents Eisenhower, Ford and George W. Bush signed similar orders — 18 in all among five Republican presidents, none of whom were impeached. They’re listed here.

  9. What a bunch of lies coming from these liberals. Reagan did not issue any Executive Order to defer the deportation of illegal aliens. That’s a fallacy! Executive Order 12324, Interdiction of Illegal Aliens, signed by President Reagan to stop the flow of illegal into the United States. The amnesty given to illegal was a bipartisan agenda and almost 2 million people were eligible out of the almost 10 million undocumented.

    1. Ramhid, you’re the one who’s lying. Executive Order 12324 signed by Reagan was to stop Haitians from arriving by boats.

      http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=44317

      Section 1. The Secretary of State shall undertake to enter into, on behalf of the United States, cooperative arrangements with appropriate foreign governments for the purpose of preventing illegal migration to the United States by sea.

      Sec. 2. (a) The Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall issue appropriate instructions to the Coast Guard in order to enforce the suspension of the entry of undocumented aliens and the interdiction of any defined vessel carrying such aliens.

      (b) Those instructions shall apply to any of the following defined vessels:

      (1) Vessels of the United States, meaning any vessel documented under the laws of the United States, or numbered as provided by the Federal Boat Safety Act of 1971, as amended (46 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.), or owned in whole or in part by the United States, a citizen of the United States, or a corporation incorporated under the laws of the United States or any State, Territory, District, Commonwealth, or possession thereof, unless the vessel has been granted nationality by a foreign nation in accord with Article 5 of the Convention on the High Seas of 1958 (U.S. TIAS 5200; 13 UST 2312).

      (2) Vessels without nationality or vessels assimilated to vessels without nationality in accordance with paragraph (2) of Article 6 of the Convention on the High Seas of 1958 (U.S. TIAS 5200; 13 UST 2312).

      (3) Vessels of foreign nations with whom we have arrangements authorizing the United States to stop and board such vessels.

      (c) Those instructions to the Coast Guard shall include appropriate directives providing for the Coast Guard:

      (1) To stop and board defined vessels, when there is reason to believe that such vessels are engaged in the irregular transportation of persons or violations of United States law or the law of a country with which the United States has an arrangement authorizing such action.

      (2) To make inquiries of those on board, examine documents and take such actions as are necessary to establish the registry, condition and destination of the vessel and the status of those on board the vessel.

      (3) To return the vessel and its passengers to the country from which it came, when there is reason to believe that an offense is being committed against the United States immigration laws, or appropriate laws of a foreign country with which we have an arrangement to assist; provided, however, that no person who is a refugee will be returned without his consent.

      (d) These actions, pursuant to this Section, are authorized to be undertaken only outside the territorial waters of the United States.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *