Day: April 1, 2009

For evidence the GOP is DOA, look no further than the release today — April 1 — of their “alternative budget.”

“If you expected a GOP alternative to the failed policies of the past that got our country into the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, then I have two words for you: April Fool’s,” said Kenneth Baer, OMB communications director…

Meanwhile, Austan Goolsbee, an economic adviser to the president and increasingly active administration spokesman, told MSNBC: “Well, look, I thought it was most appropriate that this thing came out on April Fools’ Day because this thing is the biggest April Fools’ Joke and cruelest that we have had in years…”

What were these people thinking? Like they couldn’t have waited a day, or moved it up a little? It never occurred to them that April 1 could lend itself to April Fools jokes?

The Republicans have had more missteps lately than a man who just shot himself in the foot, which they basically did after they chose Michael Steele as the Republican answer to Barack Obama and elevated Rush Limbaugh, John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, and John McCain to be the voices of attack.

How can anyone still claim that this party stands for something grounded or effective? All they have, so to speak, are tales told by idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Add newspapers to the list of businesses that might get a government bailout. What next? Shopping malls? How about used CD stores? Are any online retailers “too big to fail?” Harry & David? Omaha Steaks? PajamaGram.com?

Here’s the thing. We might not be able to keep every 1990 and 2000 decades model going in this economy. We also might have to let newspapers evolve into whatever they’re going to be next. According to a new poll, many Americans are flummoxed about what to do as we try to both move into a new era and hang on with a death grip to the old one.

Thirty-seven percent (37%) of Americans favor federal government subsidies to keep newspapers in business…

Forty-three percent (43%) say it’s better to let the papers go out of business, and 20% are not sure what to do.

Thirty-two percent (32%) of Americans believe some newspapers are too important to fail. Fifty percent (50%) reject this idea.

Fifty-one percent (51%) oppose a bill introduced in the U.S. Senate last week that would let newspapers become tax-exempt non-profit organizations as long as they don’t endorse political candidates.

What I don’t get about the widely prophesied disappearance of newspapers is why the model of broadcast television, which I still watch, doesn’t work for the press. Here’s the concept: you sell ads to companies that want to sell products to your viewers, and the viewers, in exchange for watching the ads, get your content for free.

Broadcast news, and even cable news, figured out how to make their programs interesting enough to remain in business based on ad sales. Why can’t newspapers do the same? On the other hand, satellite radio, which boasts less advertising in exchange for higher fees to listeners, is struggling. And hulu recently found that people would rather watch programs with brief commercial interruptions than either by watching one long ad at the beginning or no ads but paying for a subscription.

I do not advocate the end of newspapers. Even though I get more news online, by far, than from the paper, I think there is a place, especially for community news, in print. But propping up an industry that shows few signs of evolving with the times is not the answer.

Last week, the trade magazine “Broadcasting & Cable” interviewed Bill O’Reilly on the event of his 100th week as the top-rated cable news show. On Monday, Keith Olbermann had a field day with O’Reilly’s gaffes and misstatements, particularly including his delusion that being first for 100 weeks is a record.

Transcript:

[…]