Lowering the Bloom — On the GOP

Political analyst Craig Crawford says that New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s noisy exit from the Republican Party and foray into the ranks of political independence helps the Democrats and harms the Repugs:

Even though he was once a Democrat and despite his liberal social views, Bloomberg more naturally appeals to those Republicans who are iffy on social matters but who tend to admire a wealthy businessmen who runs government like a CEO (which he also once was).

What little polling data exists right now suggests a break toward Democrats. For instance, Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York nets an across-the-board gain of three percentage points in a 3-way matchup against Bloomberg and former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani done this month by SurveyUSA in battleground states. A Bloomberg candidacy boosts Clinton’s net margin in 10 of the 15 states surveyed, while giving Giuliani a bump in only three and producing no change in two.

The Bloomberg assist to Clinton is most evident in Southern and border states. Missouri actually flips from a Giuliani lead to a Clinton lead if Bloomberg is in the mix. And in Kentucky – one of the few Southern states that the Clinton campaign intends to target – the Bloomberg factor tightens a Giuliani lead to a dead heat between he and Clinton.

While a slew of new polls will surely test other matchups, expect the Bloomberg spoiler effect to narrowly benefit Democrats.

Bloomberg had better run for something and win because he’s quickly running out of potential party affiliations. Forget the Greens, maybe the Libertarians and there’s always the World Socialist Party of the United States or the National Nihilist Party, if he gets really desperate.

Quote du Jour

To maintain that Slavery is in itself sinful, in the face of all that is said and written in the Bible upon the subject, with so many sanctions of the relation by the Deity himself, does not seem to me to be little short of blasphemous! It is a direct imputation upon the wisdom and justice, as well as the declared ordinances, of God, as they are written in the inspired oracles, to say nothing of their manifestations in the universe around us.

— Alexander H. Stephens (1812-1883), Vice President, Confederate States of America

L.A. City Attorney’s Publicity-Seeking in Paris Hilton Case Wrecks Promising Political Career

L.A. City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo

Crash and burn: Nothing compelled Los Angeles City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo to join the fray in objecting to Paris Hilton’s early release from the county jail earlier this month.

Judge Michael Sauer, whose sentence was curtailed by the decision to let Hilton serve the rest of her sentence under house arrest, called a hearing into the matter and had it under control.

But Delgadillo (“Del-gah-dee-yo”) weighed in for no reason other than to cash in on the national publicity around the case.

Now it appears inserting himself into the Hilton case may have permanently sidelined his ambitions for higher office. Here are headlines from this month in the Los Angeles Times that tell the story:

Delgadillo has had his eye on higher office. Last year, he ran for California State Treasurer in the Democratic primary, losing to former Gov. Jerry Brown, who went on to win the general. Now he’ll be lucky to keep his job through the next city elections.

It didn’t have to be. For one thing, if Hilton had been a regular non-celebutante citizen, she would have spent zero minutes in jail, according to L.A. County Sheriff Lee, the man in charge of the jails here.

If you doubt it, watch this video of Baca saying Hilton would not have gone to jail if she were a non-celebrity. (Starts at 04:18.)

Poll: Bush Approval Remains Amazingly High at 26%

Pres. George Bush scored his lowest approval number yet in the latest Newsweek poll. Now only 26 percent of Americans say the think he’s doing a good job.

The only true revelation here, of course, is that 26 percent of our fellow Americans are delusional, by which I mean, “Republican.” Nearly two-thirds of Republicans still cling to the illusion that Bush is competent, according to the poll.

Cheney Claims to Be Above the Law – Literally

Rogue Vice President Who Exposed CIA Agent’s Secret Identity Now Refuses Security Oversight That Protects State Secrets

Just when you think you’ve run out of capacity for outrage, comes this:

So does this mean Cheney can’t claim executive privilege?

For the last four years, Vice President Dick Cheney has made the controversial claim that his office is not fully part of the Bush administration in order to exempt it from a presidential order regulating federal agencies’ handling of classified national security information, officials said Thursday.

Investigators for the House government oversight committee revealed yesterday that Cheney’s office has refused to allow the National Archives security unit to conduct mandatory inspections to ensure that sensitive materials were being handled properly.

According to Cheney, he is exempt from security oversight because the vice president has two functions, one in the Executive Branch and in the Legislative Branch, where he serves as president of the Senate.

Rep. Henry Waxman, chair of the House committee, also said Cheney tried to have the inspectors’ department — the National Archives’ Information Security Oversight Office — abolished because it tried repeatedly to force the vice president to comply with the regulations.

On one hand, this really shouldn’t be surprising since it was Vice President Cheney who orchestrated the traitorous campaign to reveal the identity of U.S. secret agent Valerie Plame Wilson, a covert CIA agent who was tracking black-market sales of weapons of mass destruction.

The final irony is that the compliance is part of a presidential directive established 30 years ago and then amended by Pres. George W. Bush in 2003.

So does this mean Cheney can’t claim executive privilege?

H/t: Thomas Kent

Study: Firstborns Are Smarter

Of course they are:

Wading into an age-old debate, researchers have found that firstborn children are smarter than their siblings — and the reason is not genetics, but the way their parents treat them, according to a study published today.

The study of 240,000 Norwegian men in the journal Science found the IQs of firstborns were 2 to 3 points higher than that of younger siblings. (The average IQ is 100.)

Though that may not sound like a lot, experts said even a few IQ points could make a big difference over the course of a lifetime — and set firstborns on a trajectory for success.

An informal poll of the editorial staff at Pensito Review found that Buck and I are firstborns, while Trish, the smart one, is not. However, our results may be skewed by the fact that none of us are Norwegian.