Don’t Trust Political Analysts Under 40
Kids are all wrong: National Journal’s Charlie Cook thinks he’s on to something in the analysis of the upcoming midterm elections — younger political analysts take a much more conservative view of how many House and Senate seats the GOP stands to lose in November. He says it’s because the older guys have seen many more election cycles as well as more eeker and squeaker races. It’s an interesting notion:
One aspect of this election cycle that has fascinated me for months is the generation gap that has developed among experienced political operatives and professional election analysts.
Observers over age 40 think that the GOP could well lose more than 20 House seats and more than five Senate seats.As a general rule, election-watchers under the age of 40, regardless of their party or ideology, see the contest for control of the House as fairly close. They foresee Republicans’ losing at least 10 seats, but certainly no more than 20, and they put the odds of a Democratic takeover at 50-50, give or take 10 percentage points.
As for the Senate, these observers tend to expect Republicans to lose three or four seats, but probably not five and certainly not the six required for Democrats to take charge.
Observers over age 40, meanwhile, tend to see a greater likelihood of sizable Republican losses. They think that the GOP could well lose more than 20 House seats and more than five Senate seats.
Most of the professionals toiling in the vineyards of the party campaign committees and watching individual races most closely are in the under-40 cohort. They tend to see control of the House as a close call and tend to be most conservative on their House seat counts. They’re also the least likely to think the Senate will change hands.
[…]


