Media Matters Answers Murdoch’s Challenge to Prove Fox News is Biased

TVNewser:

In a letter to Rupert Murdoch today, MediaMatters president David Brock, right, responds to the News Corp chairman’s challenge to “show Fox News has any bias in it.” Brock links to MM’s database of Fox News Channel items, and says: “Because we suspect your challenge was rhetorical, rather than a reflection of a sincere desire to assess Fox News’ ‘balance,’ I suggest submitting these examples to a mutually-agreed-upon panel for review. Let’s let a neutral body, rather than the CEO of Fox News’ parent company, decide if Fox News ‘has any bias in it.'”

In case you missed it, Rupert’s challenge is here.

Red State Values: SC Legislature Protects Farm Foul, Leaves Battered Wives Vulnerable

WIStv.com:

The [South Carolina] State House took up two pieces of legislation this week aimed at protecting two different groups. Up for debate was cracking down on gamecock fighting and protecting victims of domestic violence.

A bill protecting cocks passed through the House Judiciary Committee. Rep. John Graham Altman (R-Dist. 119-Charleston) was in favor of the gamecock bill, “I was all for that. Cockfighting reminds me of the Roman circus, coliseum.”

A bill advocates say would protect victims against batterers was tabled, killing it for the year. Rep. Altman is on the committee that looked at the domestic violence bill, “I think this bill is probably drafted out of an abundance of ignorance.”

Wednesday, Vicki Bourus, an advocate for victims of domestic violence, was inundated with phone calls and e-mail. The people were reacting to Graham Altman’s comments against the bill, “There’s just an outcry going on.”

Both cockfighting and domestic violence are currently misdemeanor crimes, punishable by 30 days in jail. If the bill passes, cockfighting will become a felony, punishable by five years in jail. Domestic violence crimes will remain a misdemeanor.

Could Arnold Be the 1-Term-inator?

LA Weekly columnist Bill Bradley (who is not the Bill Bradley, former presidential candidate) looks at the buzz in California politics nowadays that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, right, may be vulnerable in next year’s gubernatorial elections.

Arnold Schwarzenegger could well be a one-term governor. Unbelievable as that seemed at the beginning of the year, which the action superstar entered as arguably the most popular governor in California history, it may end up that way…

Schwarzenegger’s proclaimed “Year of Reform” — intended to capture the national political spotlight in this normally off year — has turned into his year of living dangerously. In a few months, depending on the poll, he has lost a quarter, perhaps as much as a third, of his popularity. And his ballyhooed initiatives are falling like dominoes. Meanwhile, strategist Mike Murphy is said to be telling Schwarzenegger that things are fine.

Facing a firestorm of opposition, he has already had to drop his fatally flawed public-pension initiative. He will soon drop his initiatives on merit pay for teachers and lengthening the time it takes for a teacher to achieve tenure, now only two years. Like pension reform, merit pay was ill-conceived, and Schwarzenegger has already compromised his way from a 10-year service requirement for tenure down to five years; the Democrats want four years. No need for an initiative there.

The central problem the Governor has, frankly, is that he and his administration have accomplished very little during their time in office except for borrowing billions of dollars (which, by the way, was the solution to the budget crisis that Schwarzenegger campaigned against during the Recall election) and a series of gaffes.

In particular, the only headlines made by former LA Mayor Richard Riordan, who leads the governor’s education department, were generated when he bizarrely insulted a young girl during a photo avail. “…Riordan told a child at a reading-promotion event in Santa Barbara that her name [Isis] meant ‘stupid, dirty girl,’ then told the shocked crowd that he was joking. Riordan is expected to leave his post in the near future. ”

Things have gotten bad inside the Schwarzenegger camp too.

A telling scene came last week at a strange little event at the Capitol. Billed as a “Thank You, Arnold” rally, heavily promoted with blast e-mails, robocalls and talk radio, it was a complete bust. A mere 100 supporters turned up to see the strange duo of Hollywood libertine Tom Arnold (the comedian who was Schwarzenegger’s sidekick in True Lies) and abstemious conservative 2003 gubernatorial candidate Tom McClintock.

Looking as if they could scarcely believe their great good fortune, three of Schwarzenegger’s chief Democratic tormentors, Salazar, Steve Maviglio and Bob Mulholland, converged on the L.A. Weekly as the little rally reached its desultory end. “This is really happening,” said Salazar with a note of wonderment. “We shouldn’t compromise with this guy at all,” declared Mulholland. “We don’t have to.”

Warren BeattyEven Arnold’s Hollywood friends are turning on him.

“He’s operating as governor like he is in one of his movies,” notes Warren Beatty, right. Despite his long, friendly relationship with Schwarzenegger, who has cited the actor/director as a role model in learning how to control his Hollywood career, Beatty — whose buddy Jack Nicholson arranged coaching for Schwarzenegger when he was trying to break into movies — has broken the Hollywood superstar code of silence and is criticizing the governor. Shortly after a dinner at Schwarzenegger’s home, Beatty gave a widely noted speech last month at a fund-raiser for the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a persistent Arnold antagonist, but turned down an invitation to speak at the Democratic convention because he didn’t want to look like he’s running for governor.

“This is an Arnold picture,” says Oscar-winner Beatty. “Superman walks in the room, and shit happens. That can be pretty spectacular. As long as all the characters follow the script. But this isn’t a movie.”

Tutu Just Not That Into New Pope

My hero (yes, I have met him), Archbishop Desmond Tutu is among the many who are just not that into the new pope, according to
Reuters..

Tutu, a Nobel Peace laureate and Africa’s best-known cleric, criticized both Joseph Ratzinger’s conservative views on social issues and doctrinaire defense of the Catholic faith…

“There is a multiplicity of faiths and you’ve got to be open to the realization too that Christianity doesn’t have a corner on the God market,” he said…

“God is not a Christian and we sometimes make out that God is the preserve of one particular faith,” he said.

“We need church leaders who are open to interfaith dialogue, who are aware that the truth is not encapsulated only in the Christian faith.”

Ratzinger has in the past dismissed other churches as “deficient.”

The archbishop, and all of us fed up with extremism, was hoping for someone who would take the church in a different direction.

Tutu told Reuters last week an African or Latin American Pope would reflect the growth of Catholicism in the developing world.

He also said he hoped John Paul’s successor would lift the Church’s ban on condoms, viewed by many African governments and health experts as one of the best ways to halt the HIV/AIDS epidemic ravaging the continent.

Some 25 million sub-Saharan Africans live with HIV/AIDS.

Tutu said he hoped Pope Benedict would prioritize the needs of the poor and adapt his views.

“In his record as heading the congregation responsible for the (Catholic Church) doctrine, the new pope was clearly someone who held very strongly to a rigid line that most people would find to be a very conservative line.

“We hope that sitting on the papal throne will have the effect of easing these rigidities,” he added.

Florida Democrats Kick Some Jeb Butt

One of the main thrusts of this year’s legislative session in Florida was to be limiting the supposedly runaway propensity of residents to amend their state constitution.

Even though Florida has the kind of constitution that is intended to be amended (unlike the federal one), and no one had any complaints until some initiatives that Jeb was against passed, the “problem” has been painted to be so egregious as to demand immediate action.

Floridians still remember Jeb pledging to work up a “devious” plan to keep the class size amendment from ever being enacted. Today’s Miami Herald shows he is still determined to overturn the voters’ decision.

Voters in 2002 approved the class-size amendment, which mandates that class sizes be reduced between now and 2010. Although the amendment so far hasn’t been as costly as first predicted, Bush and Republican legislative leaders want voters to change it…

Powerful South Florida, where most state education dollars go now, isn’t too thrilled. Under Jeb’s new plan, they might be worse off than they are now.

Bush insisted that his push in recent days to stress the extra money for South Florida school districts does not mean his class-size proposal is in trouble.

It would take a three-fourths vote of both the House and Senate to put the governor’s class-size amendment before voters in a special election and a three-fifths vote to place the amendment on the ballot in the 2006 election. Democrats are unified in opposition so far to Bush’s plan, meaning a special election is unlikely.

Rep. Dan Gelber, a Miami Beach Democrat, also expressed skepticism about Bush’s funding proposal, saying he does not want to alter a constitutional amendment based on a promise for more money.

“None of this is covered by a constitutional amendment,” said Gelber. “It’s an unenforceable promise. This isn’t a game show where you say let’s take the mystery prize behind Door No. 1.”

Florida House Democrats put out a great statement on the issue today and plan a news conference in the morning to really shred Jeb.

The Legislature—Not the People—is Responsible for “Cluttering” the Constitution

…the ongoing debate has failed to stress one important fact—it is not the voters who are behind most constitutional amendments; it is in fact, the Legislature.

…the voters account for less than 20 percent of all constitutional amendments that have made it to the ballot since 1968. Clearly, if there is a problem, it is with the legislature, not the voters…

Despite the fact that the first line of the Constitution says that all power is vested in the people, the Republican majority apparently believes they are in a better position to decide what should be in the people’s constitution…

The citizen initiative process exists to provide voters an opportunity to have their voices heard after becoming weary from attempting to get the legislature to pay attention to their concerns. Without Florida’s initiative process, many important constitutional amendments would never have been adopted, including Florida’s smoking ban, pre-kindergarten initiative, homestead exemption, limitations on property taxes, and class size reduction. In each of these cases, citizens took their case directly to the people after the legislature ignored their pleas…

US Dept.of Energy Lab Releases Findings Counter to Creationism

How did this happen? A scientific laboratory operated by the United States government has published results of a study of Big Bang related conditions that could be interpreted to suggest that it took God longer than seven days to create the universe!

The substance that existed just after the universe was born was more of a liquid than a gas, according to an experiment that claims to have created a new state of hot, dense matter.

Physicists at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Brookhaven National Laboratory smashed together basic particles of atomic nuclei, called quarks and gluons, in the giant Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC).

Out of that demolition derby came something unexpected: instead of a gas of free quarks and gluons, the matter seemed to be liquid- like, according to a press release from the laboratory released on Monday.

The research will be published in the journal Nuclear Physics A.

GOP Sen. Voinivich Blocks Vote on Bolton

The Democrats on Foreign Relations did their level best to derail the nomination of hotheaded Bush political operative John Bolton as US Ambassador to the United Nations but it was Republican Sen. George Voinivich of Ohio who shut down the vote for now:

A Senate committee delayed a crucial vote today on President Bush’s nomination of John R. Bolton to be the United States’ ambassador to the United Nations after a Republican senator stunned the Foreign Relations Committee by saying he might oppose the nomination if forced to take a stand.

The delay exposes Bolton, a controversial State Department hawk, to at least three more weeks of efforts by Democrats to derail his nomination as other Republicans waver over allegations that Bolton intimidated subordinates over disagreements about policy and intelligence assessments.

The delay also marks a setback for the Bush administration, which was trying to push the nomination through the committee in the face of the wavering support of two moderate Republicans, Sens. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska.

But it was a third Republican, Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio, who voiced doubts about Bolton today and forced a delay in the vote.

“I’ve heard enough today that I don’t feel comfortable about voting for Mr. Bolton,” Voinovich said. “I’ve heard enough today that gives me concern as a member of this committee.”

More Bad Polls for Bush and GOP

CBS News:

President Bush doesn’t fare very well in the latest CBS News poll with an approval rating of just 44 percent and still limp support for his proposed Social Security overhaul.

But at least he’s doing better than Congress, which earns a thumbs-up from only 35 percent of Americans – nearly as low a rating as it received last month immediately after lawmakers’ unpopular intervention in the Terri Schiavo case…

[President Bush’s] overall approval rating remained little changed at 44 percent, but his disapproval rating climbed above 50 percent for only the third time since he took office.

And despite the president’s efforts to rally support for his Social Security plan, seven in ten Americans say they’re uneasy about his approach to the issue.

More people (49 percent) say the president’s plan to partially privatize the system is a bad idea than say it’s a good idea (45 percent).

Significantly, there’s been no increase in support for Mr. Bush’s Social Security plan since he and other Republicans began actively campaigning for it in January.

Catholic Church Hurtles Itself into the 1930s’, Picks Former Hitler Youth to Be Pope

This was published before Cardinal Ratzinger was elected Pope:

Journalists have been poking around Ratzinger’s teenage years during World War II, apparently searching for any pro-Nazi sentiment…

The German cardinal is a hero to doctrinal conservatives, while liberal camps are supposedly rooting for Martini, considered more open-minded.

The 78-year-old Bavarian prelate is the supposed favorite of cardinals leaning toward an elderly figure to lead the church for likely just a few years while churchmen try to absorb the legacy of the late pope’s 26 years at the helm.

A Sunday Times of London profile on Ratzinger, saying his doctrinal watchdog role has earned him uncomplimentary nicknames like “God’s rottweiler,” reported on his “brief membership” in the Hitler youth movement and service, in the final stretch of the war, in a German anti-aircraft unit.

In his memoirs, Ratzinger speaks openly of being enrolled in the Nazi youth movement against his will when he was 14 in 1941, when membership was compulsory. He says he was soon let out because of his studies for the priesthood.

Two years later, he was drafted into a Nazi anti-aircraft unit as a helper, a common fate for teenage boys too young to be soldiers. Enrolled as a soldier at 18, in the last months of the war, he barely finished basic training.

Ratzinger’s wartime past “may return to haunt him,” the British paper wrote on the eve of the conclave’s start.

Other accounts indicate that he is even more reactionary than Pope John Paul II. With polls showing huge numbers of American Catholics in disagreement with their church over issues like birth control, ordaining women to be priests and allowing priest to marry, the appointment of this leader with a hint of fascism in his past could be construed as a shot across the bow to the faithful in this country.

Isn’t this how schisms get started?