Rice Refuses to Say Whether She Testified under Oath about CIA Leak

On Meet the Press today:

MR. RUSSERT: Have you testified under oath in the CIA leak investigation?

SEC’Y RICE: Tim, I’m not going to talk about an ongoing investigation. I’ve cooperated in any way that I’ve been asked to cooperate.

MR. RUSSERT: Including testifying under oath?

SEC’Y RICE: I’ve cooperated in any and every way that I’ve been asked to cooperate.

WHIG Was Created in 2002 to Market the War to the Nation

Frank Rich:

Very little has been written about the White House Iraq Group, or WHIG. Its inception in August 2002, seven months before the invasion of Iraq, was never announced. Only much later would a newspaper article or two mention it in passing, reporting that it had been set up by Andrew Card, the White House chief of staff. Its eight members included Mr. Rove, Mr. Libby, Condoleezza Rice and the spinmeisters Karen Hughes and Mary Matalin. Its mission: to market a war in Iraq.

Of course, the official Bush history would have us believe that in August 2002 no decision had yet been made on that war. Dates bracketing the formation of WHIG tell us otherwise. On July 23, 2002 – a week or two before WHIG first convened in earnest – a British official told his peers, as recorded in the now famous Downing Street memo, that the Bush administration was ensuring that “the intelligence and facts” about Iraq’s W.M.D.’s “were being fixed around the policy” of going to war. And on Sept. 6, 2002 – just a few weeks after WHIG first convened – Mr. Card alluded to his group’s existence by telling Elisabeth Bumiller of The New York Times that there was a plan afoot to sell a war against Saddam Hussein: “From a marketing point of view, you don’t introduce new products in August.”

The official introduction of that product began just two days later. On the Sunday talk shows of Sept. 8, Ms. Rice warned that “we don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud,” and Mr. Cheney, who had already started the nuclear doomsday drumbeat in three August speeches, described Saddam as “actively and aggressively seeking to acquire nuclear weapons.” The vice president cited as evidence a front-page article, later debunked, about supposedly nefarious aluminum tubes co-written by Judy Miller in that morning’s Times. The national security journalist James Bamford, in “A Pretext for War,” writes that the article was all too perfectly timed to facilitate “exactly the sort of propaganda coup that the White House Iraq Group had been set up to stage-manage.”

Rightwing Talker Advocates Saving Wealthy First in Natural Disasters

“OK, I’ve got an insensitive thought, folks. There’s a news story out there — there’s a news story out there that rich people got some sort of an email notification of the terrorist threat against the New York subway before poor people did. OK? They’re making a big deal out of it…

“OK, let’s get logical about this, folks. Let’s play logic with this. This is as it should be. OK? If we are faced with disaster in this country — let me ask you this, OK? You just be logical. Get all of the emotion out of this. Get all of the emotion out of this.

“But if we are faced with a disaster in this country, which group do we want to save? The rich or the poor? Now, if you have time, save as many people as you can. But if you have to set some priorities, where do you go? The rich or the poor? OK?

“Who is a drag on society? The rich or the poor? Who provide the jobs out there? The rich or the poor? Who fuels — you know, which group fuels our economy? Drives industry? The rich or the poor…?

“I’m serious about that, folks. You see, that’s the kind of thing that’s going to end up in news stories: “Neal Boortz said that in times of disaster we should save the rich people first.” Well, hell, yes, we should save the rich people first. You know, they’re the ones that are responsible for this prosperity. I mean, you go out there and you look at this vast sea of evacuees, OK? You want to get an economy going in some city? Well, who you gonna take back? The people who own businesses? Or the people that sit around waiting to get their minimum wage job, work ’til Friday, get a paycheck and then not show up again until the following Wednesday?

“Come on. Just put a little logical thought into this, folks.”

— Neil Boortz, on the October 13 broadcast of Cox Radio Syndication’s The Neal Boortz Show