GOP House Chairman Quietly Invites Hate Group Leader to Testify against Gay Marriage

Maggie Gallagher
Maggie Gallagher
Tea party Republicans won the House last year by promising to focus on the economy and “Jobs, jobs, jobs.” But in the four months or so that they have controlled the House, the GOP has focused instead on curtailing women’s rights; defunding programs that help seniors, children and the poor; and going after public broadcasting.

Now the tea party has added the fight against gay civil rights to its agenda.

Earlier this week, the Homophobe Caucus in the House quietly scheduled a hearing on same-sex marriage which it gave the Newspeak title, “Defending Marriage.” The star witness at the hearing will be Maggie Gallagher, leader of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). Late last year, the Southern Poverty Law Center officially added NOM to its list of domestic hate groups, a longstanding list that also includes the Ku Klux Klan and Aryan Nation.

NOM made headlines last week when one of its key activists, Louis Marinelli, defected by coming out in favor of marriage rights for gays.

The hearing before the House Subcommittee on the Constitution, which was announced without fanfare earlier this week, has been ignored by the “liberal” mainstream media. The silence on cable and in the press stands in stark contrast to the howls of criticism six weeks ago when GOP Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King held anti-Muslim hearings, which were denounced as “McCarthyism.”

Other witnesses who have been called to testify include Edward Whelan, a lawyer and political operative associated with right-wing extremism and judicial activism, and Carlos Ball, a law professor at Rutgers School of Law, who is gay.

The chairman of the subcommittee is tea-party Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., one of the most virulent homophobes in Congress. In the 1980s, Franks founded the Arizona Family Research Institute, which was associated with Focus on the Family, one of the best-known national nonprofits that focuses on suppressing and restricting gay civil rights. Franks’ group subsequently changed its name to the Center for Arizona Policy (CAP).

Last month, Franks joined former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich and others in calling for the impeachment of Pres. Obama after the administration announced it would no longer seek to defend the constitutionality of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). He has also called the president “an enemy of humanity” and is a proud advocate of birtherism.

The hearing is co-sponsored by tea party leader Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., who made headlines last week by leading the charge to shut down the federal government over funding for Planned Parenthood and other women’s health clinics. Pence, who is retiring from Congress next year and may run for governor of Indiana, is associated with his state’s affiliate of Focus on the Family. Last fall, Pence trounced Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin and other better known GOP presidential wanna-bes in the straw poll at the Values Voter Summit, a confab of right-wing religious extremists held in Washington, D.C.

Ed Whelan is associated with the Ethics And Public Policy Center, a conservative “think tank” funded by, among others, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, who are also major donors to tea party astroturf groups, as well as the Scaife family, best know for bankrolling the anti-Clinton “vast right-wing conspiracy” in the 1990s.

A former law clerk to Antonin Scalia, the leading right-wing activist on the Supreme Court, Whelan once called Roe v . Wade, the “Dred Scott [decision] of our age.” In 2008, he suggested that Pres. Obama’s mother — whom he called “that woman” — would have aborted him if abortion had been legal in the United States (or perhaps he meant in Kenya) when she became pregnant.

After U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker ruled that California’s Proposition 8 was unconstitutional, Whelan published an essay titled “The Most Egregious Performance Ever by a Federal District Judge.”

“Walker’s course of conduct would be sufficient cause for national scandal in any case,” Whelan wrote. “That it comes in a case that aims to radically remake the central social institution of American society makes it utterly intolerable.”

Prof. Carlos Ball is the author of “From the Closet to the Courtroom: Five LGBT Rights Lawsuits That Have Changed our Nation (Queer Action/Queer Ideas)” and “The Morality of Gay Rights: An Exploration in Poltical Philosophy.” Ball and his partner, Richard Storrow, have two sons.

At a news conference yesterday, a reporter from the Washington Blade, a gay news outlet, asked Speaker John Boehner if holding a hearing on gay marriage was an appropriate use of taxpayer funds.

“There are a lot of committees, a lot of hearings,” Boehner said. “As I made it clear from the beginning of this year, the committee process is important to this institution, and I think addressing any question — serious question — in American society is legitimate.”

Connect:

12 thoughts on “GOP House Chairman Quietly Invites Hate Group Leader to Testify against Gay Marriage”

  1. Fat and ugly – check
    loser is school – check
    Need to find like minded people to accept her for being a fat ugly loser – check

    Ya, that’s pretty much how all hate group members function. Social outcasts needing a place to feel comfortable.

    I wonder if she has a problem with Peter 3:1-5, 7 calling her weaker and in need of submitting to the authority of man? Nah, course not. She’s using traditional marriage to be a bigot, nothing more.

  2. This is misleading at best as the Southern Poverty Law center has had numerous complaints regarding that list. Which was setup using a different standard than previously used. I support Gay marrige but slandering people as a hate group when they are not is just as bigoted shame on you.

    1. What’s misleading is suggesting there have been complaints against the Southern Poverty Law Center’s list without providing a link or citation to a legitimate source — meaning not Fox News, World Net Daily, Newsmax or other Republican propaganda outlets.

  3. This would only be right if they called the KKK in to inform the comittee on the impact of jews and negroes in our nation. republicans should be ashamed of themselves or burning a rubber dildo in front of larry craigs house…

  4. You know, attacking people for being fat is a form of hate, too. It’s one of the last acceptable forms of hate, abuse and discrimination left in america.

    I don’t like this woman or her group and goals, but I see no reason to attack her for being fat when her position and attitudes a5e so odious.

  5. Actually, people of homosexual behavior are the homophobes… Homo means “man” (technically), and phobia means “a persisten irrational fear”. People of homosexual behavior, if any, are the ones who fear “man”.

    Since when are we men afraid of guys with homosexual behavior? We don’t even care.

    People of homosexual behavior, or their activists, don’t think logically, they just suggest analogies, parallels, and want to get their way. They cry on your shoulder, that they are discriminated – not so – they just think they are. And if they are, i wonder why. Maybe because they spend their time gripping and accusing everyone of homophobia?

  6. Conservative brains are wired to create an irrational fear of everybody who is not exactly like them.

  7. While I agree comments per Ms. Gallager’s weight are uncalled for, I can’t help but wonder if my referring to her as a “fathead” is also prohibited.

  8. Now activists are challenging California s ban on same-sex marriage Proposition 8 in a trial that might set the groundwork for the issue to reach the Supreme Court. Bush s former solicitor general and a lifelong Republican who also served under Ronald Reagan..In a political environment where President Obama has shied away from endorsing gay marriage as if it were kryptonite Olson makes a cogent argument in Newsweek for why die-hard conservatives should celebrate gay marriage arguing that same-sex unions promote the values conservatives prize. Olson isn t the only conservative to back gay marriage.

  9. Little Man,

    If straight men are not afraid of gay men and don’t care what gay men do then why have so many gay men been beaten up or killed by straight men. For that manner how many women have been beaten or killed by straight men. How many African Americans & women were denied the right to vote and many others rights by straight men.

    It is because straight men must prove their straightness and manliness by abusing or keeping others in subordinate positions.

    Being fat does not make one an idiot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *